that said, watch gaijin add rafale to the uk and japan. i swear that they will be the new su30 copy paste era
I guess the spam of complaints about the fakour just never happened.
Gaijin deliberately buffs the USSR. Pay attention: the entire game from BR 9.3 is balanced around the USSR. At 10.3 they have four tanks that significantly outperform the rest. For example, the penetration of shells from the TURMS or the T-80UD is about 450 mm, while the US M1 KVT (10.7) has only 370 mm. The Leopard 2A4 (10.7) with DM23 has around 400 mm. I understand that they are Russian and want to see their nation stronger, but not in such a blatant way, right?
I cant kill BMPT with KVT ot Leo2a4. DM23 not enought for kill BMPT or enemy 11.7. This game have no balance
And Ariete has DM33 at 10.7, your point ?
It’s way worse than every 10.7.
Russian bias couldnt help su39 ambush me from clouds and deflect aim9l (which isnt immune to su39 jammer).
Me in my harrier hovering in shadows and searching for russian bias and wallet warriors:
i understand all russia mains have an extreme victim complex, but not everything is an attack on your precious nation
i dont wanna get into kid fight ruzzian and usa fight, but sure maybe 80%of the complain is usa cry baby but no its the russia.
like i care
objectively at top tier air right now USA is quite poor while russia is doing quite well, what is there to debate?
idk you started. acting a victim now ?
i play many nations, i am simply pointing out the observable TRUTH NUKE
Did someone leave CpLck on?
ok
Everyone has owned something so overpowered that it overshadowed everyone else at some point. However, that only really matters if it’s Russia.
Dang, quite the advertising you’re doing for Soviet equipment.
From the beginning of the game to now.
MBTS: USA, Sweden, Germany.
CAS: USA, France, Japan, Soviets. USA since 2022. USSR and France since 2024. And Japan since this year.
Heavies: Germany, USA. No contest. Slow reloading 122s aren’t amazing options, even if IS-4M’s armor is great.
Lights: USA, China, Sweden, Italy. M10 Booker, HSTVL, RDFLT, VT5, CV90120.
Helicopters: Everyone with AH-64Es, and USSR.
TDs: Germany, Japan. Though USSR got an OP “technically tank destroyer” recently.
Fighters: Everyone really. But the most controversial: France. Most praised: USSR. This one is going to be deeply personal for most people, and there’s no real good metric to judge fighters.
There’s a lovely video I need to finish watching:
Bombers: Japan, Germany, USA.
You should’ve brought up naval though, cause Germany and USSR have the most armored battleships.
You know, a metric where Soviets objectively have something above the other tech trees for now.
Soviets getting a 0.1 second reload buff at top tier ground isn’t the big buff.
2 Likes
goated video, and i agree with the overall sentiment of it. Anything is viable in 16v16 meta
1 Like
In all fairness, the US is missing a very large portion of aircraft they developed, whether in game or not. When you build a lot of stuff, you get a lot of stuff. It’s *other countries own fault for choosing to import rather them build their own vehicles.
that for sure, a lot of nation has things missing, exemple the us with all the f16 missing, russia with all the migs missing, china and their flankers.
when your talking about import, i think your refering to the flankers ? not sure but russia did have a lot of different flankers, who result in 5 different same plane, same goes for the f16. each one is custom made for the customer need.
Jokes aside, if you have more “real” documents you can always make bug report and attach them there.
If you have solid proofs of leclerc being able to do that.
The issue is that neither of modern tanks / rounds we have in game have their real parameters because this information is classified.
Hstvl/ags, m4 sherman series, jumbo 76 or kw i c, m1 or leopard 2 series, rafale / gripen / ef2k - all of those are better than their russian counterparts. The only exceptions are td and heli because of mi28nm and bmpt. And maybe bombers because of mig27k (fighter bomber multirole thing).
Are you sure about that? Sounds like every round has “disappear and no spall” parameter and russian rounds have parameter value of 0.
Look at strv 122b+ and compare it with t80bvm.
Sure russian only thing and others dont have such privileges.
Gripen with 16 spices has almost triple frag potential (but bigger risk as well).
The moment you wipe russian bias from your eyes and find decent nato vehicles.
I’m referring to the US almost entirely in this comment. As a heads up.
What I am saying is that, essentially, of course the United States has double the stuff added, and new things every update. The United States 1. Made a TON of equipment. Like a metric ton. So much in fact that our museum fleet is one of the largest in the world. And our museum Air Force? Also huge. 2. The United States exported a lot of vehicles. So of course American vehicles are going to be added in game. 2a. Because usually when they add a US vehicle to the tech tree they can add it in at least two others and 2b. Other nations simply didn’t make as many different planes because, well, they could import whatever the US made.
That’s why the US is getting so much stuff. Because really think about it: when was the last time, before the F/A-18E, the US got a top tier aircraft that was unique to just the US? And even excluding top tier aircraft: we have the B-66B, sure. What before that? The A-10C? My point in case. Anything the US gets 90% of the time is added because other nations get it as well.
1 Like