top speed is now only 2kmh faster. And atleast imo the 5hp/ton increse in mobility isnt worth loosing 100% of the armor
Mobility=/having more top speed
Cv90120 reaches vital positions much faster than 122’s.
like i said even without the topspeed the horsepower atleast imo isnt worth the loss of all the armor. But then again it is a long range tank forced into a short range map. Idk tho i think it should still get the dm53 to be like the nato obj292
I’m not against the better shell but i don’t think gaijin has the same idea.
I dont think it is necessarily smart to let gaijin have ideas and let them implement said ideas
2 Likes
i mean the NOMADS is prety much identical to the EldE 98
are there pics of that exisiting
Sorry for late reply my account was suspended
thanks and oof
now i need that gimme
Yeah they gave us the worst version of the damn thing.
1 Like
that on its own kinda makes sense, slow progression and all that
but i would like to see more of them soon ish
1 Like
they will probably overtier it to oblivion tho. Just like the rest of the cv90 family.
1 Like
replace J35D with J35J
id rather they just add the J35J as a folder
1 Like
I don’t care where they put it, please gaijin, give us Tech tree drakens, 1/4 are tech tree rn, it’s crazy sad
1 is squadron so you can get it for free
I found out that, even in its simplest form of one launch vehicle, it has a stupid amount of range from in DCS, with its radar carrier system though, like the multivehicle SAM systems recently added, it almost doubles, so I’d really enjoy it in the Russian and Swedish tech tree as well.
Buk is proper medium range SAM. Much of what we have in game at present falls more into the short range case, at least in current configuration.
1 Like
Depends on the missile, think the Buk has access to a 30km one for shorter range
Sure you can, but that is at least several months of waiting, and like I said, not tech tree