You are both partly wrong partly correct. The Strv 123 will be upgraded from existing tanks (Strv 122a/b/c/d) and will be brought on a level of the Leo 2A7/8.
But in addition to that Sweden also buys 44 Leopard 2A8s which likely will also get also a Strv 123 designation (maybe with another letter)
So we could get 2 Strv 123s, one upgraded or rather rebuilt 122 and one completely new Leo 2A8
I think the leopard 2a8 are being named 123 b
But comparing the 123a and b whats the actual difference… just the composite by this point?
The ones being upgraded are being called Strv123A, the ones being bought is the Strv 123B
shouldn’t they be the same? they are meant to be equal to each other and i don’t see any reason for the composite to be any different
One will just be brand new and the other one will have some wear and tear
yeh but the strv 122s composite hasnt been updated at like all… while the 2a8 uses newer composites
its also underperforming in game lol
whats underperforming
leo2 armour from 2a5 and 122 up
I think we should just got the cv9050 variants at this point. There is no excuse for gaijin to add the shittiest mk4 cv90. Just give us the 9050 as a foldered tank. We could have the 9050 with spikes or aps or even both.
The CV9035 MKIIIC that has already been purchased if what I want in game now. Take the 9040C hull. Slap on the Mk IV turret but with the 35mm cannon, Akeron MP instead of Spike and Iron Fist APS.
And for goodness sake make all the CV90s able to track aerial targets.
give us akeron+50mm+aps. And for fucks sake give the cv90120 dm53. Cv90120 never went into service it doesnt have a designated ammo. They literaly state that the cv90120 was made to use all current and future nato shells. 90120 ingame is useless rn since its the same mobility as the 122 but with no armor. The autoloader doesnt matter if you have an aced crew aswell. Just give us dm53 and make it a true tank destroyer
Wut?
90120 is far more mobile than 122’s.
top speed is now only 2kmh faster. And atleast imo the 5hp/ton increse in mobility isnt worth loosing 100% of the armor
Mobility=/having more top speed
Cv90120 reaches vital positions much faster than 122’s.
like i said even without the topspeed the horsepower atleast imo isnt worth the loss of all the armor. But then again it is a long range tank forced into a short range map. Idk tho i think it should still get the dm53 to be like the nato obj292
I’m not against the better shell but i don’t think gaijin has the same idea.
I dont think it is necessarily smart to let gaijin have ideas and let them implement said ideas
i mean the NOMADS is prety much identical to the EldE 98
are there pics of that exisiting