underperforming HOW?
I have no idea.
But iirc, kept saying that its K/D was less than the others added and thus it was performing worse than them
Clownery.
The entire ship is ahistorical in everything except size and armament. It should have a turning circle of nearly 960ish meters, armor about 15 to 20% less effective, guns with notably worse accuracy and even then it’d still be extremely strong due to how overperforming the shells are.
1 Like
Yup… but hes a soviet main that things everything soviet is underperforming. Thought the BMPT going from 10.3 to 10.7 was unfair iirc
I can say without a shadow of a doubt that Pr23 Sovetsky Soyuz isn’t underperforming and neither are Imperatritsa Mariya or the Sevastopols unless they broadside.
2 Likes
So it’s BR is perfect! :)
Not really, SoDak and Tosa are genuinely better platforms
And others are worse - so 50/50
At 8.3, the only thing that I’d argue Bismarck straight up out performs is the Richelieu class.
IJN has better guns, similar firerate and speed at lower ratings, US has overall better ships at 8.3 and we don’t talk about the Littorios because of the 1.3 rpm tomfoolery.
Bismarck could maybe get away with being 8.0 but that’d tilt its power level a bit more than it should even though it can likely be killed by 7.0s.
1 Like
I got my main canons ammo detonated by the secondaries of the Haruna Bot…
I still dont know what they feed the bots.
Sometimes they are on absolute dopamine and other times they wont shoot me from 3km…
I havent played the Bismarck the past months but the one week I played her it was caos…
I agree with you.
At 8.3 its ok ish
Below its good
And above well…they are in another rank in my opinion
Haruna have SAP rounds in stock you probably being detonated by them, but secondary shot hit you after barbet caught fire that why you saw it in kill log .
Sorry the secondaries killed me.
detonated the ammo
Kill card isn’t always right - usually shows the last thing that hit you and not what actually killed you.
1 Like