Two different roles keep that in mind, I think the concorde is the best looking passenger plane, maybe the 777 too
yes and the non fat one looks better
the non fat one is too wide, from the back
6 engines is 50% better than 4
1 Like
Okay, has the xb70 ever sail the seas though ? .-.
Spoiler
or flew while a solar eclipse
Spoiler
3 Likes
has the concorde sustained mach 3 for over half an hour?
no but has the xb70 supercruised at mach 2 for 3 hours?
1 Like
no but I’d say that 30 minutes at mach 3 is more impressive than 3 hours at mach 2
you realize that the most economical cruise speed for the XB-70 was mach 3 right?
care to explain? never seen anyone say thats the best looking aircraft to ever exist
I said supercruise, I don’t see where the xb70- could reach mach 3 without the use of ab
I agree its not supercruise but the XB-70 cruising speed is actually at mach 3
can the Concorde flap its wings
I know that, probably as impressive as being able to sustain twice the speed of sound without the use of ab considering the concorde has 4 engines
no, does the xb70 have droop snoot ; )
isnt that only for taxiing
for taking off and landings too
1 Like
so it has 0 benefit for performance, unlike XB-70 flapping wings
well no, it’s actually quite helpful for pilots at least
i said performance not pilot.