11 is borderline pay to win and painful
The 29K is heavier, being a carrier variant. You’d possibly have something akin to the 29SMT - not in a good way.
2 Likes
just 1 ton heavier for no reason.
1 Like
understandable , oh well a nice mig35 would be an interesting addition
hahahahah omg
ngl mig 29m might be better because mig 29m gets 120 cms compared to the 32 of mig 35 even though it is a lot older
1 Like
Well no, a few reasons. The 29K has bigger wings with wing-fold mechanisms, bigger fuel tanks and reinforced undercarriage. Carrier versions inevitably weigh in more than land-based aircraft for this reason.
Engine power is a few percent greater but not enough to really change the basic dynamics of the airframe. The main upgrades would be in terms of weaponry rather than aircraft performance.
thank you for informing me , after googling the mig29m it actually would be a good addition , wonder if it would be the same for mig33 and mig37
mig-29m also gets those bigger wings. 90s mig29m = mig 33. mig 29m (2005) is slightly lighter but only gets 32 cms
1 Like
still can’t believe we haven’t seen the 29K or 29M…
Adding a modern 29M would be nice considering we’re getting the Sufa and the 29K should have come alongside the Su-33 and F-18
1 Like
wtf why would anyone only use 32 cms , it was created in 2005 too as if they didn’t know about air warfare
its crazy actually , mig29s family is quite interesting and is a nice addition between major steps but there are literally only 2 variants in game still after 3 years
You haven’t noticed gaijin does everything possible to avoid adding new airframes?
3 Likes
Yes, it’s quite sad actually…
It’s not like there aren’t many to add either…
More fulcrums would be great to see, and long overdue
1 Like
Too much work, have another copy paste rank 8 premium.
screw a SARH, gimme 4 ET’s on the 29G and I’ll be vibing with my 20km snipes
1 Like
if only east germany didnt collapse before the 29m…
1 Like