Nice and all, but is it possible for a rocket launcher vehicle like it to be added in researchable TT? like the USH 405 rapid rocket launcher?
and thanks for clarification.
1 Like
Probably not researchable. All other MLRS vehicles in the game are premiums or event vehicles, unfortunately.
1 Like
seeing the low tier pbv that absolutely does nothing and has horrendous speed, idt think in the slightest that this thing is comparable or in the same level as XM800/wiesel/FOX or even the RCV.
This report specifically adresses and documents the Lvkv 42’s ammunition , showing that its current HEFI-T and SAPHEI rounds are incorrect for the 40 mm lvakan m/48 L/70. The report proposes SLSGR m/484 (HE-T) as the historically correct HE round and correcting the AP round to Slpprj m/42B (APBC-T).
I made this as a separate report from the broader Lvakan m/48 report because the Lvkv 42 has its own official KATF technical description , allowing the ammunition issue to be directly tied to solid vehicle-specific documentation. The older report covers the wider Lvakan m/48 issue, including the VEAK 40, but the VEAK still lacks an official KATF technical description. And has been adressed as not having enough information to fix the VEAK ammunition. So hopefully atleast the Lvkv 42 will be fixed.
Edit: Just found out the tech mods arent doing any work on bug reports atm for REASONS. so i guess this will take a whileee
6 Likes
The Pbv 301’s firepower is very different from that of the UDES 08.
The UDES 08 uses a 25mm gun (25x137mm), instead of a 20mm (20x110mm). Same cartridge (ammunition), but different gun, that the Bradley IFV uses.
The gun has double the cyclic rate (900–1,000 RPM), 30% higher muzzle velocity (1,100 m/s), larger payload in the ammunition (double the HE-filler in HE-rounds), and has more modern ammunition types. Ammunition types include HE-I, SAPHE, APC, ADPS and APFSDS, among others.
It also has a dual-belt feed, making it able to quickly switch between and HE- or AP-belt, if desired.
I think it would work pretty well as an SPAA, or even a light tank.
Mobility is fairly average, as it is built on the Pbv 302.
1 Like
theyre on strike?
Did not know that
No, are they on strike?
I just hear “logistical reasons” for why the tech mods aint doing stuff
1 Like
Reminder that the 20mm Akan m/41s on the T18B and T18B (57) are still askew. present since the old forum was still alive.
Turns out the T18B (57) was fixed but not the T18B
The right one is just tired and napping on the side of the plane, give him a break 💔
2 Likes
Story of the twins’ lives, huh?
I mean, the only other example I can think of is the T18B not initially getting the bomber FM buff, but I’m sure there’s more.
[DEV] pbil M/39 incorrect camos and visual textures Community Bug Reporting System
[DEV] incorrect gun and visual model of the M39
Community Bug Reporting System
[DEV] pbil M39 wrong name
Community Bug Reporting System
2 Likes
Wait, if that is the suspended arnament of the Saab 105XT, why does the one in Warthunder doesnt?
The ÖE is based on the XT iirc but not to the same extent capability wise
The G is entirely different from both
but why?
For the same reason some countries tend to not buy every upgrade kit for a vehicle. They either don’t see a need, or money wise it’s too pricey. Again I’m sure someone could answer it better it’s been a while since I looked at the history with the XT but both the XT and SK60F would be awesome to see
Well, somebody told me, the In game 105OE represents the 105XT, so thats why it has the arnament the real 105OE doesnt have. Now i just got confused on why there is a picture showing what the 105Xt can carry, but it is not the same in game
The Saab-105XT is the export demonstrator owned by SAAB while the OE is a variant for the Austrian Airforce based off the XT. While the 105G is a upgraded version of the XT and the Sk-60F is a heavily modernized Sk-60B that implemented all the upgrades of the 105G on said airframe alongside upgrades unique to it.
Either way it’s theoretically possible for the OE to use the same weapons that the XT though the 105G is also missing some of it’s armaments that the OE used. It’s likely done for either Historical accuracy reasons i.e what weapons the Austrians have in stock and/or intentionally hold off the remaining armament loadouts so Gaijin can add the XT as a separate vehicle later along the line.
Here’s the passed suggestion for the Sk-60F for further reading
1 Like