yeah no its just some stupid retards that see a dcs or a render think its real. and start going on x and reddit spaming us super f15
what you read is maybe about the double pylon aim120 belly rail that was once showcase at a demo.
2 Likes
Could be. I must have read about 2040C eagle instead of F-15EX
Max with normal pylons is 12, with the MRML already added to the C GE you get to 16 (the minimum we’d get in the game) and with the AMBER racks on the belly you get to 22. Not sure AMBERs are operational with AMRAAMs though
Mate you have done nothing but treat me with a condescending attitude every one of you posts FOFF AND STOP TALKING TO ME. and STOP derailing the topic. AND FYI Ive blocked you SO AGAIN STOP DERAILING THE TOPIC FOR THIS SHIT.
Get it through you thick skull I HATE EC MODES AND IM NOT GOING TO PLAY THEM NO MATTER HOW MANY INSULTS AND STAT SHAMES YOU THROW AT ME and now I’m going to spawn in and then land and leave so I leave an empty slot just to spite you arseholes because of this attempted bullying me into playing them.
holy
Most beautiful crash out
3 Likes
I have no idea who is right but I won’t be surprised if this is all true tbh, many users here get disrespectful super fast
not what i’ve said,… you were complainning about F-5T SCU not being fast enough to get bases - i just pointed at you that F-5T SCU is a fighter not a bomber,…
i gave you many other general tips,… and i could give more,…
you being edgy on the situation is a you problem,… i did nothing to ask for you to play EC maps specifically - i only did told you that F-5T SCU shines as a fighter and not a bomber + Uptier doesn’t mean shit to the gameplay of F-5’s
you can be whatever you want,… but when you post on forum, having replies is a normal thing.
1 Like
In game F-16C/F-15C us JHMCS I right? And would JHMCS II have ability to highlight friendly like scorpion can?
Yeah, they use JHMCS I. JHMCS II indeed does have IFF as part of its Blue Force Tracker system.
Long answer:
The original Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System was designed primarily to project weapon and sensor-cueing symbology onto the pilot’s visor, off-boresight aim cues, reticles, and basic aircraft status information. Its focus is on these, not on displaying full identification data such as IFF on the helmet itself.
JHMCS II adds modern digital capability such as full-color symbology, enhanced situational awareness, data link and Blue Force tracking displays. According to the manufacturer’s, data link and Blue Forces Tracker are specifically listed as supported display elements.
https://www.elbitsystems.com/air-space/aircraft-systems/helmet-mounted-display/jhmcs-ii
2 Likes
Well that’s good to know. Thanks for the info
1 Like
@CyrusJacob Do know you if ALR-69A(V) provides coverage in both X and Y plane or only provides coverage in x plane just like AN/ALR-56M?
You mean if it can determine whether a radar on the RWR is above or below the aircraft?
If so, not that I know. It has the same limits as the ALR-56M, only 2D on the RWR screen. Though afaik, F-22, F-35, and F-15EX all have 3D RWR with geolocation.
1 Like
Ohk :(
Answer would be buffing amraam turn performance.
3 Likes
That would also buff Eurofighter by a lot and then gaijin will either nerf Eurofighter or nerf AMRAAMS again
F15ex also exists, which is coming soon
And it will do what? Against rafale F4 and eurofighter it won’t be any good. It would also be missing half of its features and gaijin will add those features maybe 2 or 3 years later. F-15 FM are also not good, you turn once to notch and you lose all your speed. My only hope is F-16V and even that would be missing 360 rwr in Y plane. Atleast it would have good FM
1 Like
The only thing I can think of, that would meaningfully help is HOBS missiles. Whilst these wouldnt be added in a vacuum, and aircraft like the Typhoon would get equal if not better HOBS missiles, it does open some doors for how the aircraft can operate. Airframes like the F-18 do well in close range dogfights but are usually forced to rely on guns rather missiles because they lack a decent dogfighting option, Aim-9X would add that option.
After that there simply isnt a Gen 4/4.5 airframe equal to the Euro-deltas, they were built around an entirely different philospohy with entirely different design requirements, they will naturally have radically different strengths and weaknesses compared to US “equivalents”
Eurofighter would only receive meteor that would be different from US fighter (only in terms of ARH and not ir) and do you honestly think gaijin won’t nerf it and make it as bad as AMRAAM?
And gaijin only focuses in bringing players closer and do WVR instead BVR where F-15 should be good. Dogfight are still common especially in ground rb and Eurofighter and rafale excel in Dogfight, and having a good FM is very important to somewhat counter them. Thats why my only hope is F-16V until they do something about air RB