bro im playing the update right now what are you talking about
5 Likes
minor typo
someone made an oopsie
are you playing one of the new vehicles or do you play existing vehicles? since the old vehicles mostly did not change it is possible that you can play without crashing
i did also play the new F18.
guys I’m tired of this premium spam now there’s also Ariete Certezza spam
it’s shameful
for those who didn’t understand it’s a joke, nobody bought the Ariete Certezza
16 Likes
So F-4EJ Kai have same battle capability as F/A-18A (they both 12.3), noted
I don’t see 200GE compensation for purchasing Ka-50 Black camouflage not so long ago (but before the dev announcement). Should this question be addressed to Customer Support?
1 Like
Don’t just play on 11.7. Although my win rate on 11.7 is much higher than on 12.0.
it was a joke to say that nobody bought the Certezza
…why not just move top tier up? I’m happy that the early battleships are being made more viable. But we could’ve just moved the 7.0 ships to 7.3 and this wouldn’t make 5.0 ships face 6.3 BBs
10 Likes
What do you mean? If you purchase camouflage, you should have it. Have you checked in customization menu for Ka-50?
My first 3 battles after the update are in the same map… i glad to see the map rotation still completely broken.
So did they break RWR again or? I dont get a single RWR warning from any fox3 or apparent locks
1 Like
playing F/A 18C E rn, its just the Aim 7 P thats bugged so for now just use 6 aim 9l, staying up all night to use my 80 dollar pixel plane just for broken update
1 Like
Updated my post. I mean it was purchased short before it was made free (grindable), which feels as anti consumer practice. I am happy for them being made free, but it should be honest too.
I was expecting that GE will be refunded the same way as with removed vehicle modules
Okay… why is the F-18A in front of the foldered F-14’s in the US Air TT? What was the rationale there?
1 Like
It was changed from GE to mission. You will not get compensation for that, sorry.
1 Like
@Stona_WT Concerning the Tornado MLU
I would say thank you for correcting the laser designator by introducing the Litening III, but BOZ-102EC still needs to be added as per the accepted suggestion, as it is also visible in the asset view.
For the moment I’ll skip the other reports regarding armament, which have been accepted and which I would consider so far as “nice to have.”
However, the pod would be quite important given the assigned BR context.
I wouldn’t want Italian users to be disappointed again after the AIM-120s were denied for the F-16 ADF.
BOZ-102EC is a documented and accepted report concerning available options.
Thank you!
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2ZdiDcftjJMt
for refence the suggests passed
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Vy5ZjhTKRgMj
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/P4gBwdqsttSZ
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Vy5ZjhTKRgMj
4 Likes