They don’t.
Yea, 30km vs 120km its fair xD
gaijin what is this your sick kicks for unresearch GBU-39 I painstakingly researched just because you put LGBU in place where it used to be?? it’s not even a linked one too
not even part of the compensation as well
I’m sorry, it didn’t show me this modification, instead there was an empty field.
I still think that this is a completely incommensurable weapon, to drop these bombs you have to be within the SPAA range anyway, this plane is too slow to be able to drop such bombs from a long distance, it is still a bomb vs. a rocket with darts that can be fired from over 25KM and hit the target without any problems, these rockets do not lose the lifting power like bombs
Once again, a premium machine is added that is better than other machines in its BR, once again Gaijin wants to sell a vehicle that will destroy any remaining balance in this game, this is simply a repeat of the Terminator, you don’t want to tell me that the Terminator wasn’t a problem
The QoL additions in this update are genuinely some of my favorite parts of the changelog. Features like multiple target points for guided weapons, default camouflage selection, improved customization tools, new HMD/MFD implementations, and various UI improvements may not be flashy headline features, but they make the game noticeably more enjoyable to play for some semi-top tier planes.
1 Like
When is nuclear thunder starting?
You can drop these form over 10km on the a7e you just need a bit of altitude and speed, realistically you can throw them even closer as you can just turn around
Thats only the case with the a7 the bucaneer can just do it without any problem as well.
No where near the case, the terminator is a 11.7+ vehicle that was introduced at 10.3, this is a 9.0 vehicle with 11.3 armament, at the end of the day this is a worse aircraft on all metrics that something like a tornado gr1 at 11.3 or an su 24m, it is at worst an 11.0 aircraft.
Bruh SPIKE still doesn’t properly top attack so basically its now worse than before
2 Likes
The ground spike? Or the helicopter one?
I do not agree that 11.3, these rockets are quite fast, do not lose lifting power and can be fired from a very long distance, the problem will be several such machines in the air, time will tell what will happen now because of this, 10.7 means the possibility of uploading to 9.7 which will be a complete tragedy for this BR
The F-111F also has a similar type of armament and it is somehow 11.7 with only two such missiles and worse optics
Ground. It now triest to loft more comes in at a way too shallow angle like on release
@Stona_WT Hi, Do you know why the Abrams fuel bulkheads were nerfed to 9mm?, is there a source for this?, of anything shouldnt it be better at 25.4mm?
There was a report about this accepted 3 years ago with no change?
Community Bug Reporting System(fixed url)
9 Likes
this is also not an issue with the pgm 500 or the kh58 they also have more than enogh range, not to mention the huge performance difference of the aircraft
Exept that one have an ir seeker, not a tv one, and it can also carry the gbu15 also with an ir seeker which also have MILT
So we’re using an J-7 RWR to nerf J-10 family and J-15T ?
2 Likes
- MiG-29 (all variants) — roll control at high and low speeds has been improved, losses during forced turns at high speeds (from 0.7 M and above) have been reduced.
What’s the source for this buff?
Yeah, with zero source. Great.
Why do some changes say what the value changed FROM and TO and others just don’t. It’s so inconsistent in write-up clarity. Most say, but then NS-23, changed to 690 M/s…cool. From what? I looked it up but it’s just weirdly inconsistent on when some notes just give zero reference.
Iirc from 710m/s
they’re using a source from J-7 to nerf J-15T mate
2 aircrafts in same platform made at same year
Honestly, why did Gaijin give Japan the Leopard 2 PL at 12.7 right now? They are in dire need of light tanks with Spikes like the Vilkas and a decent top-tier SPAA, instead of this Type 03 “S-400 copycat” with a 5 km dead zone
1 Like