I’m curious what the stats will be for 3BM42-2, if it will be the same as 3BM42M that we had in the past.
Arguably a more significant buff for the BVM than for the T-90s, since the BVM can now choose to run a worse but still 500+mm pen dart for a 0.4 second faster reload.
so now p2w Su-39 is even MORE better than Su-25T at same BR
Probably not much higher pen but I am sure it’ll be better against ERA
Looks like Heli battles are completely unplayable at lower tiers now, Gepards and ZSUs intercept every missile coming at them. Doubt it will ever be fixed too
@Smin1080p_WT or @Stona_WT (or any other staff really)
question , because this is very confusing
in the patch notes we can clearly see that this was indicated
this is backed-up by data in files indicating what armement is supposed to have this feature (see bellow)
HOWEVER after some testing , this feature seems to only half work
the secondary’s , controled by ai , will clearly target incomming amunition (not just missile , bomb’s to , etc …) , but for some reason they will not fire. (see bellow exemple with ASM-2 , but this was tested with other type of munition’s)
+several other exemple’s that didn’t fit in the forums in this mega link
on the other end AI ships will defend themselves against said ammunition just fine (see bellow)
BECAUSE the only sentence about it is so vague , idk how i supose to interpret it , and if i need to do a bug report or not about it … ?
This is insane. And I don’t think this is intended
Haha its insane when it happens to US tanks but when it happens to Russian tanks its normal?
Go cry about russian tanks to someone else. I don’t have problems with them
Can we get bomber and plane sharing like you did with Rewards for Crashed Aircraft
bombers share some pr and sl to fighters to protect them and like wise bombers get some rewards of fighter kills
just an idea
im still trying to figure out what i gained on top tier britain, 2 abrams is not exactly good enough to justify ruining every challenger
(im also not a fan of the devs who think they know more than the British MOD when it comes to L27A1’s performance)
anyone else pinging the map when they scroll in??
Had this too in ASB
Such a long changelog and the game is now as unplayable as ever. At this point just AI generate things and put it as changelog might as well be the same thing.
Refusing to balance things and overall incompetency of the developers of this game is stupid. You purposefully have to be so bad at making a game shitty when you have everything to make it great. every time someone bring something about the BMPT you just stay silent, After spending money in this game I would wish I would have never done it because as a customer I feel deeply stupid for have speeded it on a game which instead of being fun is just frustrating. Also lets make it less obvious the bot reviews on steam can we?
I know am gonna get banned for this and at this point I don’t care. Insufferable game with oppressing forum and incompetent developers.
he dont fire becouse the radar lock when you use that’s ship dont work with the sam becouse have an a saclos so it fine. it half implemented in future when let all work good with the sah/sarh and add same surface radar for see better the antiship missile he work for moment i think he work only for ia correctly.
when you tested on the nuclear thunder is normal he work is an a base of testing how to balance modern ship.
Are we ever going to see major sales come to consoles eg the summer sale
I simply can’t afford to always buy premiums at full price and don’t want to wait until the 1 or 2 sales there are for consoles which are only 20 to 30% anyways
thats kinda your own fault to even do that. And power over when sales happen on console is in Microsofts and Sonys hands not gaijin
The problem with LMUR is trajectory, i.e. control, not seeking, probably also apply to other AGMs. It never dropped before the target, but fly over. Especially when:
It seems that the missile failed to correct in its terminal stage. The cruise stage worked properly, yes, but the missile always try to reach the cruise stage, even it’s really short.
The ballistic algorithm must consider a possible hit zone, and the target should be always included into it, thus, keep the target in the engagement zone, which it failed. The zone should be determined like, if the terminal maneuver started, the nearest boundary it could reach. The ‘cruise’ trajectory also lead to problem with anti-aircraft hit.
IDK, but if the dev is using 4th bezier curve or something, try dividing it. It’s a missile, and should be with some correction real-time-ly. If the problem can’t be figured out, I strongly recommend you to give up the cruise stage idea, which is quite reasonable IRL.
Yay 2 more Abrams to grind after I already finished the US Ground tree 3 times!
Continue the topic about LMUR trajectory problems. IRL, therere indeed some reasons for a missile to perform maneuvers. Take these examples:
