Bruh SPIKE still doesn’t properly top attack so basically its now worse than before
2 Likes
The ground spike? Or the helicopter one?
I do not agree that 11.3, these rockets are quite fast, do not lose lifting power and can be fired from a very long distance, the problem will be several such machines in the air, time will tell what will happen now because of this, 10.7 means the possibility of uploading to 9.7 which will be a complete tragedy for this BR
The F-111F also has a similar type of armament and it is somehow 11.7 with only two such missiles and worse optics
Ground. It now triest to loft more comes in at a way too shallow angle like on release
@Stona_WT Hi, Do you know why the Abrams fuel bulkheads were nerfed to 9mm?, is there a source for this?, of anything shouldnt it be better at 25.4mm?
There was a report about this accepted 3 years ago with no change?
Community Bug Reporting System(fixed url)
9 Likes
this is also not an issue with the pgm 500 or the kh58 they also have more than enogh range, not to mention the huge performance difference of the aircraft
Exept that one have an ir seeker, not a tv one, and it can also carry the gbu15 also with an ir seeker which also have MILT
So we’re using an J-7 RWR to nerf J-10 family and J-15T ?
2 Likes
- MiG-29 (all variants) — roll control at high and low speeds has been improved, losses during forced turns at high speeds (from 0.7 M and above) have been reduced.
What’s the source for this buff?
Yeah, with zero source. Great.
Why do some changes say what the value changed FROM and TO and others just don’t. It’s so inconsistent in write-up clarity. Most say, but then NS-23, changed to 690 M/s…cool. From what? I looked it up but it’s just weirdly inconsistent on when some notes just give zero reference.
Iirc from 710m/s
they’re using a source from J-7 to nerf J-15T mate
2 aircrafts in same platform made at same year
Honestly, why did Gaijin give Japan the Leopard 2 PL at 12.7 right now? They are in dire need of light tanks with Spikes like the Vilkas and a decent top-tier SPAA, instead of this Type 03 “S-400 copycat” with a 5 km dead zone
1 Like
They basically read “0.9” somewhere and thought it was 0.9 CENTIMETERS instead of 0.9 INCHES, which is 2,5 CM…
3 Likes
At least now i will get rewarded when i get revenged killed
im so tired of them just ignoring us, i feel like if i make a bug report on it they will just tag it “duplicate” or “not a bug”
1 Like
I don’t think " in dire need of" and “tanks with spikes” ever fit into the same sentence.
Worst of all is;
They added the reworked models only to half the Abrams tanks, and, upon being reported, they only said “meh, we will add it to the rest later or something”.
Oh, and M829A3 is still a renamed M829A2.
Oh, and only M1A1 got the corrected mantlet and skirts, not even the other tanks that got the “rework”.
But SEPv3 not EVEN getting the 1990s 35% KE figure was just… anyway.
4 Likes
Grass is greener on the other side moment, then at the same time you have the Israeli mains beggin for anything else
2 Likes
Because the Leo 2RI can tank even DM53 with its hull.
Hm I saw it was 600, thought it is an increase.