War Thunder "Eagle's Shadow" - Changelog

The Su-39 has thermals but no ARMs with the 11.7 preset, the Su-25T has ARMs but no thermals. Its a tradeoff.

Let’s gooo the Khod thermal pod was added to the Su-39!
It’s currently a bit bugged and you can’t use the thermals, but I’ve already made a bug report about it.

2 kh29te are still there tho. And in some cases they will be better choice than kh58u.

You can use it, but you have to cycle past the Optical TV sight mode and the TV missile sight mode before you get to the Khod mode, then activate the thermals from there. Pretty awkward at the moment

2 Likes

На JAS39 как была проблема с количеством контрмер, так и осталась. Видел кучу репортов на эти проблему, и хоть бы хны. На пакетном Грипене такой проблемы нет

You’ve picked the wrong forum bro. That’s not RU one.

sooo 2 IRCCM missiles at 10.7. At 10.7 there are multiple planes with very few countermeasures: in a downtier that means you get 2 free kills.
I really hope you’ll add another dinamic br option for the Su-25SM3 so that it gets moved up if it uses R73s.

3 Likes

Hi guys! We are aware of the issues with the “Nuclear Escalation”, we are working on resolving them as quickly as possible.

5 Likes

Oh alright, well that’s gotta be a bug regardless, and it should be fixed soon.

Yes, usually the first TV only mode is hidden

1 Like

R73 irccm is a joke. I assume its 10.7 because su25bm sits at 11.0 with 2 r73 and 2 r60

1 Like

FOV IRCCM is bugged at the moment

Hey man, im probably blind, but i cant find it ingame in the graphic settings, my Nvidia Driver is uptodate, if that helps.

Yea it only works when it locks a flare afaik

2A6HEL is its name no matter how much you want to whine and cry, lol

Hi. The issue was recently resolved. I have updated the report with the developers response

https://community.gaijin.net/p/warthunder/i/T9Srt2HhlufK?comment=aKAAcDbBfe2rElIvk0xixBTq

2 Likes

Sadly whilst we appreciate its always a disappointment that things can change, its precisely why sharing things too far in advance can be a negative if its just going to open the possibilities of disappointment.

People always ask for more info, but sadly it needs to come with the understanding that its always subject to changes and not set in stone.

Sadly not everything planned can make it, and as we make clear in the CM update, we are reffering to things still in development with every possibility of a change.

7 Likes

gotta say, the lack of internal ESM for nato aircraft, the ridiculous addition of R-77 on planes at way too low of a BR, no MAWS for F-15EX/IA, no regenerative steering but epicyclic steering is added? really disappointing.

5 Likes

Where is the APU for the 2PL?

3 Likes

The Yak-141 did have a radar installed, its static testbed had it functioning and ready for extensive trials before the program was cut.

The S-41M fitted is entirely compatible with the R-77 and was designed with ARH integration in mind.

Developer choices. It wasn’t even going to be a TT vehicle at first.

1 Like