I’ll be able to sleep soundly tonight—a critical bug affecting the AMX-30B2 Brenus has just been fixed.
But in all seriousness, when is this issue going to be addressed? It’s an extremely important report that severely impacts the vehicle, and it was accepted four years ago—have you really not had the time (or the inclination) to fix it?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XN0AZmOkU0Ym
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Z0H3xuwhqEkH
2 Likes
The YouTube video that dropped on the official channel like an hour ago at least mentions MAW for the F-15IA, would be hilarious if only the Israeli version got it, as the coping on the forums would bless me with some peak entertainment. Sadly I can’t check yet as I’m still updating my game.
2 Likes
Seem to have broken Nuclear Escalation on tropical coast , battle lasted 3:23 there where no airfields to spawn on . Just the aircraft carriers . 10.7 battle rating .constant ticket bleed
1 Like
Its funny everyone but unique scorpion predicted the R-77 BR raise.
2 Likes
From the discussions and image measurement on the 2A8 thread, it seems to be correct,
-7,67 would be more accurate from the Norwegian source but close enough.
Wasnt the gun depression associated with the driver camera, that actually sits much lower on 2A7V/2A8 than on the model referenced in the sources?
3 Likes
No, because it makes no sense for the elevation to also be a lot lower.
Hmmm, how is DLSS 5 enabled? I can’t find it anywhere!
Finally, something useful to use with the AESA radar.
Sparrows are good, but these will make it better. Wouldn’t even mind playing 14.0 either.
First came IR jamming, then comes radar 👀
The Arado 234 B-2 should also get variable br’s! this update has made the existence of the premium Arado 234 B-2 (WB-151) invalid as the whole premise of that vehicle’s existence lies on the fact the WB-151 gives it a higher br!
2 Likes
You mentioned F-15IA’s MAWS, a feature that had already been removed, in the official update video. What’s that supposed to mean? Is it a hint that you’re planning to add it back soon, or are you just teabagging us?
3 Likes
Hmmm, how is DLSS 5 enabled? I can’t find it anywhere!
“Neural rendering” toggle in the graphics settings.
1 Like
Wood vs Metal should not matter when all changes are based on +% durability and not alterations to the underlying material strength measures.
A weaker airframe model receiving the same % upgrade as an all metal design will still remain weaker overall. Wood wouldn’t suddenly match metal skinned structures in durability (and fabric wouldn’t magically equal wood), it would merely be an improved version of its own pre-updated model.
If the aim is to treat different aircraft doing the same role by different rules then it must be represented in changes to the vehicles battle effectiveness (ie ultimately BR). Who’s going to want to fly wooden planes if they fall apart to single 7.62mm rounds whilst slightly stronger thin metal skins can tank multiple 20mm+.
1 Like
Thank you!
slop update for china 😞
2 Likes
Wow I just saw the video and IT IS TRUE…I don’t know what were they thinking…make fun of players who were waiting for F-15?
2 Likes
why, this is just not true, also not fixing the nato hump on the leopard series. this feels like theyre just trying to nerf germany even more
2 Likes
the NC has a unreasonable ticket burn (even if both teams had players alive in the air) and it doesnt let you respawn on normal airfields
suggestion:
change the name to nuclear naval escalation
6 Likes
You forgot the hidden UK nerf. It neutralises the buff added. Same for the Lancasters.
1 Like
Am i blind or where is the DLSS5 Update, or rather said, where can i actually turn it on?