Ok, so let’s wait and see.
Do you think they will actually follow through?
I think they’ll get through the reports and figure something out based on the information presented.
My minimum hope is 600mm.
I think 750mm was cited for LFP of SEP I cannot remember the full report right now tho.
1 Like
No. This is for your team so they know that guy is dead.
Personally, people need to be a bit less rigid. Its a great modern UI adjustment.
1 Like
It’s from the russian source in the bug report.
And I agree, 600mm KE protection on the LFP would be great and not unbalanced. It would just be like facing a T-series hull but inverted.
Well the UFP shouldnt be pennable either, and the turret ring should be not exposed, should be 220mm, and the wedge should kill HEATFS
But the SEP should get a min of 750mm imo, with the turret being 950 KE and 1300 HEAT
I saw a picture of someone measuring the driver’s roof but I forgot what report that was on.
They claimed 1 inch on current, so 63mm fix.
But it could be 1 inch extra of 50.8mm, which would be 76mm instead.
1 Like
I prefer some balance over 100% accuracy, which requires the Abrams to have at least some decent weakspots.
I can live with the turret ring weakspot, the LFP will at least help save the abrams from reactionary shots.
1 Like
I think the deal is also the angle of the UFP. But its just impossible to tell how much if at all that theyve thickened it. But its certainly not a weakspot IRL. Thatd be stupid as hell
I got:
“api-ms-win-core-com-l1-1-0.dll not found”
Error at start. Tried to find it online and put that .dll into system32 and game folder but then it said error starting that file. BROKEN!
Is it just me or is radar in ARB doing all kinds of weird things? Like AIM7-M going to narnia after launch instead of towards the radar lock?
Ok the game just autoupdated and it started without problem. Looks like you guys fixed it. Nice. Thanks.
I was really worried WT forced Win10 on us (I’m still on Win7 xD)
I cant. The 122+ doesnt have any frontal weakspots but maybe the breech. The abrams should be the same way.
Its fake. Im tired of the game being made fake. If BRs need to go up because its fixed then please lets do it. We can actually add non-DU variants to fill lower BRs, something that hasnt even been considered
Thats the fix.
2 Likes
It actually does? A large part of the UFP and LFP on the Strv 122 is a weakspot. Branching out to play multiple nation is a great way to improve.
G.91 R/3 — a 750lb M116A2 incendiary tank, 250 kg SAMP Type 25 bomb and LAU-51 rocket launcher pod have been added. The number of bombs and rocket launcher pods has increased from 2x to 4x.
Source: Siegfried Wache - F-40 Flugzeuge Der Bundeswehr #29 Fiat G/91 R.3 1960-1968 (1997)
Siegfried Wache - F-40 Flugzeuge Der Bundeswehr #26 Fiat G.91 R.4 (1996)
the above changes should apply also to g.91 r/4 in italian and german tree.
1 Like
are you frikin kidding me right neow?!! @gaijin, wat this?
Challenger 3 TD’s cheeks have been hotfixed!
I am very happy with the speed at which this specific issue was addresed.
Leopard 2A7V and M1A2 SEPv2 are still a big mess, but at least now I can grind and look forward for Challenger 3 TD, hahah (even if many issues still persists with CR3 and the 2s, at least this one was addressed quickly!)
2 Likes
Thank the lord
2 Likes
It’s normal for a Germany. Relax…
