War Thunder "Air Superiority" - Changelog

Why am I not surprised that gaijin have rushed the update out rather then taking there time to implement the changes and fixes that need to be done. Like Spall liners haven’t been properly modelled in all NATO vehicles rather than fix challenger 2 and challenger 3 TD you have made them worse which doesn’t surprise me and challenger 3 TD has lost 100mm in the turret how do yous managed that ???

1 Like

I currently just hope that I do not have to research the chaparal in the israeli tech tree because of rank VIII being a thing.
If that is not the case, I will be happy…
Even though my merkarva 2D and Sho’t are worthless now for the last bit of the tree

I havent played yet but I looked at the tech trees and I find it weird.
These are my main concerns about tech trees.

11.3 tanks in Rank 8?

These tanks should not be in Rank 8 as their BR is 11.0-11.3:
Germany: Leopard 2PL
Sweden: CV 90120, T 80U (11.0)
Israel: Merkava Mk.4 B, Merkava Mk.4 LIC

I hope this is done by mistake as these 11.3 tanks are in Rank 7:

US: M1A1 AIM, M1A1 HC, HSTV-L
RUS: T-80UK, T-80U, T-72B3
UK: Challenger 2 / 2F / TES, Challenger 2 OES,
Italy: Centauro I 120, Ariete PSO/WAR, OTOMATIC

Not to mention why move Israel 11.3 Merkavas into Rank 8 without even introducing premium rank 7 tank like Merkava Mk.3D? Not to mention it sits at 11.3

If I compare it to jets the rule also applies for jets that 11.3 jets are part of Rank 7 and anything from 11.7 goes to Rank 8. If Arriete AMV can sit alone in Rank 8 then Merkava Mk.4M should too.

No BR 12.0 for tanks?

Why isnt Br 12.0 introduced? At least for the new tanks and probably for T-80BVM it would suit it better than 11.7. 10.7 games will be more unpleasant and unbalanced because of this.

I find this changes to rank on different nations too sloppy and ignorant without giving thoughts to it. Please Gaijin fix ASAP.

2 Likes

This is a very good thing - what about SB? In SB you can face an F16 china or F16 japan as opponent. IFF will just catch F16 on RWR, which I frequently take then as a friendly.

1 Like

I said 122B not the 122B+

And yes for me this is an insult directly to the face

1 Like

@Smin1080p
I would like an open explanation regarding the situation with the Leopards.
Nothing with them was fixed, and now bug reports get denied with the reason “Not a bug. Report based on the datamain are not accepted” ?
What the actually fuck.

14 Likes

the worst problem here is that you need to research israels 8th Rank with a lineup of two merkavas and a SPAA
Other nations have similar problems, destroying the researchefficency of some backups in lineups and encouraging players to use smaller lineups without backups from lower brs.
amx 32 and 40 for example were nice backups at 11.7 to support the first leclercs. But now they are useless at rank 6 if you want to reserach the last two leclercs or the ito

Wait 6 laser guided bombs? i thought it only got 2 of them

incredible, the fucking ERA is still grouped together for no reason

Datamined information has never been accepted for a bug report. This is not spesifc to this report.

Datamines cannot be used for bug reports.

5 Likes

Did not happen in Tumbleweed.

Are you going to give a detailed answer about the Leopard 2A7V? Or did the company decide for the community and blatantly ignored bug reports about this?

3 Likes

Because the issues didn’t get reported before right?
Quoting you again regarding the massive bug report with the 2A7V.

Smin1080p commented 2 days agoEmployee

Thanks for your report. This has been forwarded as a suggestion for consideration. Additional supporting comments with extra material have also been attached. We have cleaned up the comments a little to keep the report on subject. As a reminder to all users, please do not spam the comments of reports. It makes the handling and reviewing of issues more confusing. Please use the forum if you wish to have a discussion on any given subject. Thank you for your understanding.

Nothing from the bug report was fixed.
Instead now you start with “datamined information has neven been accepted”
That is one way to ignore a massive issue and never have to deal with it again.
Classic double standards.

6 Likes

Datamined information has never been an acceptable basis of a bug report. This has nothing to do with any one vehicle. It’s always been the case.

4 Likes


safe to say the JAS39C is a welcome addition to the uk

1 Like

Something good atleast
How’s the performance

where was that thing placed in the tech tree?
I could not get onto the live server yet

after the FGR2

1 Like

good enough i almost won a 1v3 in that match only dying because I got energy trapped by an F16AJ

What is the BR in RB?