meanwhile britain hasnt got a capable SPAA from 4.0 until 8.3 with a full scale gap from 5.3-8.3
Clearly this indicated the need for more commieslop SPAA
6 Likes
If it’s the BTR-3
Maybe a folder of the current 7.3 BTR or even the new AT?, that is if they don’t give it to JP or someone else.
I just rewatched the teaser and it’s the Foch; at the moment of the Rafale’s takeoff, you can hear a heading according to the TACAN of the R99, which is the Foch’s number.
4 Likes
Noo, much here like 9.0-10.0
it has 30mm and very good atgm
You can bet your right arm that the Pantsir’s new (probably fictional) kinetic missiles won’t phase through like the Stormers. Or spark. Or not kill.
Insta kill everytime, I’m calling it.
5 Likes
thx gohs and that is perfect!
1 Like
As an IFV enjoyer.
I hope we get more BMD / BMP / Whatever creatures honestly.
BTR-3 is Ukrainian and *used by the Thai, it’ll probably just go to Thailand
1 Like
Oh WOW!!! New carrier model with Rafale Ms on it! Charles de Gaulle…???
Wrong, Clemenceau. Decommissioned in 1997. Rafale M entered service 5 years later. Bruh.
4 Likes
Nice silent hill reference.
1 Like
eh it looks like a mid update, glad for the ww2 vehicles thougth and the “new” map
It has never been more over.
yea but it should go to the USSR TT too
wha?
Almost, it’s the Foch; I made that mistake at first too.
1 Like
I just don’t play JP thats all.
i mean, one of the biggest suggestions on the forum is Ukrainian TT, a lot of people obviously dont want it there
1 Like
i recommend it, lots of silly (and Type 89)
1 Like
Ukraine was part ofthe USSR i dont understand why not the ukrainian tanks go there? (specialy when most of them are USSR tanks that are geting modified)
1 Like
prob because political reasons but wont go into that, kinda obv thougth so it wouldtn be fitting to put it in ussr tech tree so they do it with japan instead to avoid that headace, wouldtn blame em
3 Likes