As others pointed out… @Tocadrop (but this goes for everybody) Do NOT use profanities and disrespectful language in the forums. Criticism is always welcome when it is constructive but if you add rants and start swearing it will simply turn into a deleted message. These are the rules, and we ask you guys to please follow them.
And on a sidenote, please do not turn this into some political discussion.
I’d say there are trailers like “Victory is ours” and “Heroes” which focus on WW2 air, ground and (somewhat) naval forces
And considering the current focus on cold war and modern vehicles, such a trailer fits really well
Dude’s forgetting about the Shenyang F-5.
And how does that count as a tech tree?
You said:
And you were shown that both exist in game already. Now you’re moving the goalpost.
North Korea is incredibly unlikely, it’s basically reskinned Russian planes. (That specific MiG-15 you think is North Korean is in the Russian tree already.)
And playable aircraft carriers? Highly unlikely with how the game is currently designed.
Man you guys can make a really nice trailer!!! I always look forward to these!
Theres no moving goalposts. If you want to quote then at least use all the relevant piece…
It should be pretty obvious it was tongue in cheek by its obvious over emphasis. People have based far more earnest ‘proofs’ on even less than this cinematic.
Basic models and camos do not constitute playable vehicles and country (sub)trees.
Loved the cinematic trailer! There was a lot of attention to detail, especially to the FCS of the T-90M. If only the maps looked that good 😫
Are the APFSDS models for rounds with anti-ERA tips already in the game (i.e. the anti-ERA tips actually impact the round’s anti-ERA effectiveness)? Because at 0:42 the Abrams shows a round that has an obvious tip to it, yet it also doesn’t do anything except jostle the vehicle.
Also the Abrams getting shot in the turret ring is yet another middle finger from Gaijin…
I am so glad these came back, honestly it’s what inspired me to play the game in the first place.
They don’t model ERA (Kontact 5, and Relikt) are not modeled right either, their irl values are higher than in game. So technically it’s modeled without being modeled.
ERA values are less, thus it pretty much means the penetrator is there for all vehicles vs ERA.
The IRL values are lower, and certain in-game rounds (DM53 and M829A2) underperform against at least K5). I was just wondering if the models of the APFSDS in game actually include the anti-ERA tips, since if they don’t the trailer could hit at anti-ERA tips being modeled.
I just remembered this meme I made some time ago, trying to encapsulate what this trailer perfectly does;
It’s rather quite the opposite in terms of those ERAs. But I’ll let you believe whatever you desire.
russia stronk
is it just more or do few people see the amount of lies in this trailer?
yeah i like the part where they changed the angle the t90 fired back at the abrams because the shot they initially showed would be impossible and the apache flaring the strela? L O L
Dude you are over thinking it.
It’s a trailer. If your that hell bent about it, why didn’t the T90 shoot first? It clearly saw the abrams before the abrams saw it.
what? a trailer that everyone else notices the ah 64 flaring a strela or the shot that would never pen a abrams? lmfao n ones over thinking anything.
lol and you somehow think that russian ERA works vs m829a3 lmfao
