Unfortunately, it exists and showcases.
APU-68 could use KH25MT, and KH25MTP is just the thermal version of MT
1 Like
The issue is they’re worse than Kh-38MLs so the switch from Kh-38MTs wouldn’t impact its BR.
Link to website which is wikipedia thrust level…
And even then, theres nothing about missile test. Only about that there was mock-up at some event
I haven’t found any difference between KH25ML/KH25MTP’s engine; they both work 11sec, which means the 20km range is like AGM65s, depending on the ALT and launch speed.
I am not sure if Ka52 has that test; someone mentioned it was equipped on the KA52, but not clear
Specific evidence?
Not really but thats not required.
Its a kh-25 which is compatible with the su17,22 and 25 series at least.
This is the pylon name right?
This is Moreso to balance the sheer OP nature of the 38 than to adjust the su25s br
Yeah one is direct fire while the other can employ a glide path for extended range