Il see what people say. I dont know what the BR is like TBH as my highest ground is 6.7
I play 5.7 and its vs 6.7 every game, honestly worse than BR 12.7 air for uptiers.
Not sure what waits for the turms at 9.7 but if 8.7 is another hole il guess it isnt much fun and it only has 1 tank to put with so its not looking like a buy
JH7’s are still rising on Ground in 12.0
There is no reason to move them to 12.0
They are just on line with most common strikers / Fighters on 11.0-11.7 BR range.
Having 4 x f&f KH29 or ir bombs are not reason enough to make em 12.0 and making them see 13.0 in ground,
Only thing what should be done on Jh7’s are drop em in 12.0 in ARB instead keeping them 12.3
not a big deal honestly, AIM-120A/B is still better than their supposed successors so people tend to use them over the C and D even at 14.7 and i don’t think the R-77-1 is that much better than the R-77
this is warthunder, 90% of the time the enemy is genuinely straight up blind.
the average WT player isn’t smart or good either, i don’t have enough fingers to count the amount of times i’ve beaten eurofighters in a dogfight with the Kfir C.10 or the M2K5F back when the BR roof was 14.0 when they should’ve walked all over me
Vehicle: Sherman III/IV
Mode: GRB
Change: 3.7 → 4.0
Reasoning: It’s simply the best Sherman, as it has its MG port weakspot covered up.
The Cromwell V shouldn’t be at the same BR, having a worst shell, less armor, and no vertical stabilizer.
It feels very strange to leave it alone at 3.7 when the Chaffee, Pz.IV, and even the SAV201248 are moving up to 4.0, where they rightfully belong. And where the Sherman III/IV especially should be too.
It really should not be facing 2.7’s.
Which is fine, given range largely doesn’t mean much and slower platforms like the F18S aren’t really firing Bs from that much further away. But AMRAAM Vs R-77 sub 10km is significantly in favour of the R-77 if you don’t fire them in HOBS