Please do not spread such false info.
Please re-read article and linked changelog.
1 Like
That will kill interest in this mode.
Please allow it.
I for myself will not touch air rb. Its boring.
During advance it was possible to grind if i remember correctly.
11 Likes
Can you answer why naval was left unchanged?
In the current state they basically shoot down any missiles and Penguin still doesn’t sea skim and is too slow so it always gets shot down.
Not to mention Naval targets basically have no SL or RP worth even going after them. This was a fairly talked about issue and yet it’s been ignored
5 Likes
It wasn’t, unfortunately.
They really need to change this though if they want these modes to be successful. The future of their game depends on them after all.
5 Likes
well they did make it more difficult i guess thats something
That’s admittedly a new one for me, I stand corrected…
But isn’t that more the exception than the rule?
2 Likes
Nice. They ignored most of the important feedback critical to the gamemode that was provided.
Also, putting this F-16XL event out and not allowing for mission score to contribute to the stages creates big FOMO and a lot of people won’t play this test run past today.
11 Likes
Then i misremembered…but Something was allowed to unlock later on during the advance test…i just cant remember what it was…
Not really, we have those towers for both anti air and anti Ground, it’s called Odin
We looked at some for vehicles but we decided crew mounts were cheaper
2 Likes
My initial impression is that they are trying to cull nuke rushing airfields. And making convoys less unfair to attack because AI sees through trees.
Im a bit skeptical of adding more spaa sams to replace things things like the m42.
M163 and shilka munitions interception is still my biggest gripe.
And obviously a buff to red sam missiles since they were clearly worse than hawks
3 Likes
Not really, here is a Pantsir on a rooftop in Moscow.
4 Likes
bc gaijin have zero clue of how to do a good game, they just had luck with wt and thats it
2 Likes
The Gaijin way unfortunately.
Ask for feedback then listen to the bare minimum whilst ignoring most of the larger and most talked about issues.
5 Likes
I was gonna say doesn’t Russia and the US have SAM mounts on buildings?
Pretty sure the US has NASAMS mounts in DC
2 Likes
Oh come on, that would have been the fun part.
So we gotta decide between NE or the event plane
11 Likes
Aw man, why does this have to be during a grind event?
2 Likes
MANPADS Giraffe
Ye, it’s more of a point defense thing where you and the enemy both know that there are soft targets in the area that need to be defended well.
Because Gaijin has to make stuff as difficult as possible.
3 Likes
a lot of high value buildings for military’s will have roof mounted or or tower mounted units to help protect from attack, the US uses C-RAM batteries, RC(remote controlled) stinger sites, for the US, Pantsir-S1 or Pantsir-SM for russia are a few notable cases.
1 Like