is it intended that there is a BR spread over 1 in air sim at top tier?
because i wonder what something like a F-16A ADF is supposed to do against a Su-30SM2 or an AESA EF
6 Likes
It is LDIRCM. Not so good coverage as 28, 64 etc but it is still LDIRCM
I might agree for the HSTVL and RDFLT but the Abrams should absolutely be a higher BR than the stuff thats now 12.3
So are they gonna fix anything in the QN506 to uptier it again? Ridiculous that it still classified as a light tank while loosing all of your ammo in a single shot and being unable to replenish it, the small ATGMs still drop to the ground for absolutely 0 reason, the artificial limitation of being unable to lock F&F missiles with the commander sight is still in place, isn’t a shame that a game in Roblox portrays better the vehicle than the so called “realistic” game?
9 Likes
Dude T-72M is way superior to XM
4 Likes
Finally we’ve got through defs that 12.0 Abrams are no way equal to other 12.0
G, 12.0 abrams tanks were way better than other 12.0 contemporaries.
3 Likes
It’s not laser, which is what the L in LDIRCM stands for.
Go read the revised DIRCM devblog to see this, as it’s the most recent time gaijin’s spoken about it
The Ka-52 uses IR lamps to stop SOME ir sams and non-irccm aams, however it’s nowhere near as effective as the likes of AH-64E/Mi-28NM/Z-10ME, etc
Most things are… but it goes fast and has shit thermals
Games gone full pay for pain. Theres not many premiums I own that are better off now. F2 thats about it
GAIJIN, THERE NEEDS TO BE LOADOUT DEPENDENT BR.
I understand increasing BR of vehicles with fire and forget weapons, ok? I totally do. But you CANNOT just destroy completely lineups of (premium) vehicles like this. AT LEAST give the option to keep playing the vehicles/lineups by taking a different loadout of less potent fire-and-forget ammunitions or something.
IT IS TIME!. Instead of this decompression (which is fine, oppressive CAS with click-and-kill weapons sucks), there should have been no ‘decompression’ of vehicles, but just ‘decompression’ of the FnF munitions themselves by giving a BR penalty when actually equipping/carrying those. Would be a MUCH better solution.
11 Likes
I dont think the abrams deserves to go on 12.7 when T-80UE-1 and Leo2A4M only go to 12.3 (like it was planned for abrams too).
2 Likes
No its not lmao, Its just regular dazzlers that spoof early IR missiles
This. Theres no line ups left
1 Like
I strongly disagree, why do you think that they were / are better?
Theyve shown the ability to make it work, tie the Br to your loadout similar to how spawnpoint cost for CAS is decided and you have lineups that can change based on weaponry choice, provided the limitation that you’re locked to only loadouts compatible with the br of the match when you join, so you can’t cheese it
1 Like
Yes and no.
SP cost must be adjusted to how much ordnance you’re bringing. Because it’s idiotic that a Su-30MKK has less SP cost than a strike aircraft with IR weapons despite bringing 6 TV missiles,2 ARMs and 2 R-73s
XM1 overporforms every T-72M, even Italian one
3 Likes