I’d rather they actually listen to feedback to a major degree personally, 1% or 0% literally does not do anything to me practically
Well yes it would be better if they listened to the community, but comparing nothing to barely something I would rather have something, no matter how small
Or bring back the “bug” where bases actually respawned within a reasonable time frame
3 Likes
Yeah all I was saying is if I am saying those vehicles are bad… then they are bad
Like the 906 for example, I have 374 battles in it, and a 1.73 KDr and it’s one of my favorite vehicles.
(Despite its flaws)
Meanwhile the T58 I have a 4.24 KDr and 379 battles… yes I know the T58 is OP.
1 Like
In my experience, I cannot lock missiles with non aesa radars in HMD mode, at least the jets I’ve been playing recently. I don’t recall if it is possible to do it with AESA in HMD but in TWS you can select the missile targets as usual
1 Like
yes , this is what i was referring to . its possible to do with a mechanical radar , but much more consistent with AESA , which is why the MCM tactic is more prevalent at those tiers , and reason to segregate those BRs from plaguing 14.0 and below
Was there a mistake with Yak-3U? Wasn’t it changed to not go to 6.7 in grb?
I’m completely disillusioned with the balancing in War Thunder. Gaijin - You have thousands of posts of feedback, many of them practically universally supported by the community, and yet you ignore them almost completely, balancing vehicles according to their “efficiency” (SL profit rates) rather than actual capabilities. Neither logic nor fairness is considered - the profit of the company comes first, even though Gaijin’s profit margins are already abnormally high according to all available metrics. You’re taking the money and running away, instead of using it to improve your service! In light of these facts, the line between “business” and “thievery” is quickly vanishing for Gaijin.
Rather than being used as a mechanism for productive community input, the encouragement and advertising of “feedback” is instead exploited as a barrier to redirect player frustration, tricking them into writing useless comments under posts rather than uniting to bring real change. In the same sense, expressing hope for change in War Thunder is equivalent to talking to a brick wall. It doesn’t matter if you are polite or mean, if you are quiet or loud, if you cite emotions or facts; the wall simply stands there, unmoving.
The sheer scale of hypocrisy and ignorance displayed in the management of this game is astounding. Top-tier air sees many aircraft moved up while similarly powerful aircraft are left in place. Ground forces see increasingly conspicuous inequality. And the worst of all: most high-tier attack aircraft and helicopters are absolutely massacred in Ground RB, becoming even less powerful than the SPAA systems that cost 1/5th - 1/10th of the SP. Against same-BR SPAA and fighter aircraft, they are like mice hiding in fright of a housecat, rather than credible challenges that are fun to play against.
3 Likes
Some of these br changes are the dumbest changes yet. Top tier yeah but 75% of these things below 11.0 didn’t need to be changed. What are these devs smoking when they make these changes and can they let me know their supplier to cope with these shitty br changes.
Did they even read any of the feedback? R we serious
1 Like
I played a few Kfir Canard battles yesterday, and in almost every match, my opponent’s team consisted mainly of aircraft (11.7–12.3) BR. I really don’t know what the hell they were thinking when they gave this fighter a BR of 11.3, two AIM-9Gs, a meager 36 small-caliber flares (with F-104’s hot engine…), no radar, no “J” band in the RWR, etc.
Let this dynamic BR finally be added; I’d gladly remove the bombs from it and have a normal BR of 10.7, which it deserves.
5 Likes
Nonsensical answer after ignoring, as expected from someone who doesn’t have anything to back up his equally nonsensical claim.
1 Like
su 24 being 11.7 and mig 27 being 11.0/11.3 while my tonka gr.1 is sat at 12.0 is just peak.
I guess the bmp 2m is worse than the ajax now?
1 Like
Damn this line makes so much sence now.
And seriously keeping Igla shilka on 9.3 and PGZ07 and 04A in 10.0/9.7…
Could you actually fix AHEAD ammos finally if you think those are equal to HEVT shells on york…
2 Likes
Free SPAA is free SPAA, even if it doesn’t have any mods, it works
At this rate, thanks to the ideas of people like you, Gaijin won’t be able to find anyone left to play in simulation battles.
Keep it up. The focus has already shifted away from WWII anyway.
The problem is the way maps are tending
If maps were bigger then the EBRs could move up in BR, but so many maps end up being CQC funnel feats, so the net performance of EVRs keep them where they are
1 Like
Drives me nuts when they wait to update foldering or to rearrange tech tree after changing BRs.