A-10s have F&F weaponry
The Su-25s that went down don’t
4 Likes
I hate all of those SPG changes. They’re bad because they don’t fit the game, not because they’re underperforming. You could put them at 1.0 and they’d have the same stats.
2 Likes
ive played the TU 95 i have it spaded havent done B52 yet
Even with the decent QOL that the dart is, nothings gonna make it 8.3 worth
Do you mean that it is correct for the enemy to use aircraft and helicopters to kill many of our teammates in GRB, while it is wrong for our teammates to give up all CAS capabilities and spawn a 400 spoint AA vehicle just to prevent that from happening?
1 Like
Tried reporting it in the past, on the old forum. Got a response saying “the armour diagram doesn’t specify the thickness”. Hmm, maybe that’s because it’s uniform with the rest of the front plate and the “weakspot” should be that it’s got cast modifiers.
1 Like
I know you might believe this topic is a duplicate of the other topic, but still doesn’t make sense when most of players believe R2Y2 can get a BR reduction and the developer refuses to consider it, did they already forget these planes or ready to add other planes instead of it? Last time we had L-39, but now it moved to 7.7, which means 7.3 doesn’t have any CAS again, what reason made R2Y2 still keep 8.0? Still efficiency? or just because they are deleted so developers don’t care? You know in AB it is only 7.3
kikka is adequate.
not every lineup needs OP cas
Dear chinese player thats defending a chinese heli. If you use a little more of your brain, you will understand that its very OP because other nations cant do the same and because only china has such strong missile.
Give it to every nation and i will be fine. But of course you wont support that.
Unless you are playing literally anything else. You could move the EFTs down to reserve rank and split them 50/50 between the 2 teams and they would not over preform when 2 3rds of each team is EFTs, but they would not be fair to the other reserve planes would they?
The community has been screaming this for years: De-compression! Top BR should have been raised to 15.0/15.3 a long time ago and that is only considering the ARH carriers, not all the lower BRs that also need decompression.
So the devs do know what the issue is, they are just refusing to implement it.
3 Likes
R2Y2 is not good CAS as well, and Kikka is 100% not worth 7.0 in GRB
We don’t even need decomp, the Su-30mk2s are literally just 13.7s larping as 13.3s, but ig devs can’t see that somehow.
And I hated their excuse of “they would start facing top aircraft that carry a lot of ARH missiles”. IT CARRIES 10 MISSILES! The POBIT AT 14.3 CARRIES 6?? Do they hear themselves?
3 Likes
Sorry, re-reading that part of my comment I see it wasn’t clear, I wasn’t trying to imply that the Su-30s should not be 13.7, rather that if the devs do not want their new premium cash cows facing top tier, then the solution is de-compression and moving the top tier higher (like the community keeps asking), so the Su-30s can go up without facing top tier, not forcing the premiums to an artificially low BR.
But you are correct, the Su-30s faced top tier planes when they where released as max BR was 14.3 at the time and still did well.
Yeah, that one doesn’t make much sense to me, It seems like a side grade to the F-16CM, you get MAW and ESA radar but lose the better engine (I haven’t heard that the AIM-120Ds offer any real improvement worth noting), that doesn’t seem worth 2 BR steps.
The A-10As only went up, along with the Su-25s, because they both had All-Aspect missiles and people complained they were OP in a downtier. F&F had nothing to do with them then. I remember this causing a stink because even Gaijin said they did not want to increase their BR. So either move them back up or move the A-10As back down.
Skill issue was a huge problem, not Churchill 7. That thing is armor, armor, armor and nothing else. It’s supposed to be hard to pen, that’s the only thing it does - being hard to pen. Even so, 75 Shermans and 76 T-34s absolutely have means to deal with it, nevermind actual anti-armor options like M44 or Su-152.
4.7 is the highest BR it could possibly be at.
Edit. Re: angling - you realize that Churchills can be set on fire through the radiators on the sides? Proper angling only works while in cover. If a lower BR tank with medium-to-low pen for the BR can frontally kill an entrenched superheavy, what’s the point of said heavy even existing?
don’t forget the M10s and dicker max’s
The roof is probably the easiest thing to pen on the whole tank, since it is only 20mm thick. When I have played the Churchill VII, I have been more scared of Russian tanks and their angle pen accidentality hitting the roof, than the German 75mm on the Pz IV.
For a long time, it didn’t not help that it was using solid shot, so you could barely damage the Russian tanks, if even penning them.
Turret roof, tracks, MG port, even the turret corners also controller drift shouldnt be taken in to account thats your own problem. My mouse is old now and sometimes double clicks should i get a BR change for that?
IS-2 getting lowered to 6.0 while Chi-Ri is somewhat at 5.7, idk what Gaijin is thinking
Nobody thinks these vehicles have only 0.3 BR difference at all.
Oh thx, then just bit linger.
Just one of the Panzer IV and the Puma is missing at rank III and Ger could run a low tier linup again.