Yeah, a shame they stopped doing Roadmaps as those were quite nice to have.
I hope Gaijin continues to be more communicative with the community…
5 Likes
I so much like that they get feedback for Nuclear Escalation the whole weekend and they do… NOTHING.
That company is for nothing really.
They just beg for money…
1 Like
@Stona_WT why only change the stock rounds now? They’ve been pretty bad for some time, is the reason for doing it now to finally close the depth between stock and spaded performance or is it because some rounds couldn’t pen the SEPv3 LFP? And, if the reason is to close the gap in stock vs spaded capabilities, are there any plans to improve the stock performance of tanks elsewhere in the game?
1 Like
I don’t know anything about that missile and i have no connection to development nor any contact with the developers.
But if you have the sources to prove your claim then feel free to make a historical report on the bug report site.
So glide bombs are still gimped? You added Gbu-53s but they are unusable atp…
3 Likes
Yeah, I agree.
Why OFL 120 F2 become worse than OFL 120 F1 ?
Good news! Let’s just say I was just a “teeny-weeny upset” (profanity self-control mode enabled) when this happened to me yesterday…
Thanks…
2 Likes
Was just wondering is there any info , since we cant lock any arh missiles on air targets atm,and those missiles are on air To air missiles when opening secondary weapons. It was reported, but closed having that reason, that any arh’s cant lock air targets.
It does seem quite amusing to have air 2 air missile on loadout what you cant use against enemy jets,
I did a quick check. The LD-10 is listed as a “To hit radio-emitting targets” and not air to air. It’s not an ARH missile, it’s a PRH missile. It’s designed to hit ground radars of anti air systems.
1 Like
It has been moved I see.
And yeah, arm was ment not arh 🤣
And it would be quite logical, since it is PL-12 afterall, just different seeker
Yeah no chief, not gonna happen considering there is nothing stopping 122’s to use DM53.
My 122’s are happy with DM53 while causing another rage crisis to German mains :)
Eh I personally just would’ve rather the CV90120 get fixed over more Leo stuff
Kinda surprise the only fix for Nuclear Thunder is that, BUK could have been moved a little bit further away and this would have aid much more about the playability of BLUEFOR
Have you tried reinstalling the driver?
If not give that a go and select Custom,
that gives a completely clean install.
Hope that helps.
(I have had no gpu driver issues with this Update myself)
Version: 610.62 - Released: Tue Jun 16, 2026 [Nvidia]
Me too but you know Gaijin.
Fixing 90120 would actually require real effort rather than adding already existing shell into 122 family so its natural for them to chose this way.
yay
PRH is capable of anti-air use if it has a steady emission source to track on a compatible band.
That is a easy fix most the other stuff unless you move alot of stuff it will take time I bet next test will be better
Hey, can we see a fix to this bug anytime soon?
This one about the j15t catapult
It’s been 3 months since it was accepted, and the Nuclear Escalation event makes it all the more important to fix.