It’s a 3.7 - 5.0 map, not 4.7.
It’s good that you can’t spawn large ships in a map for smaller ships, though that doesn’t mean that higher-tier Destroyers should be entirely exempt from playing the map.
It’s more like 500g or so.
Eh, M322 is still living up to its hype.
The instances I found on the recent ground map reworks have been yes. With that, it is in such obvious places that it should not even exist in the first place. In fact, the instances are SO obvious that it basically proves the map(s) was never in any QC at all.
I mean, it is OK to blindly love something with a passion but same time - slap back at the game where needs be.
Bruh💀
You can take the missing information about Abrams from advertising brochures at exhibitions and stands.
There’s also the Object 292 round as well. At 10.7 too.
Yes
Hell yeah hand me that Aroma Espresso Bar ice cafe immediately
The only explanation I can think of about this is because of the poor armor, Merkava Mains adjusted to a certain careful playstyle that increased their winrates.
It also does not help the low amount of battles compared to other MBTs in the same BR bracket.
There could be 50 Merkava mains who are very very good players, kicking its stats upwards.
Makes sense to me seeing all the braindead leo and soviet players rushing the obj thinking theyre invincible.
Loose nuts behind the wheel sadly.
can also fix the HE-111 bombs inside the bombay just dropping when they feel like it and making it miss most of the time.
maybe in general don’t give bombs collision with the plane in general? at least before they move away from it
1 Like
engineer simulation
but the swedish trial document outright said that the export M1A2 has substaintially less protection than the domestic one
the current ingame DU turret is base one the swedish trial protection with some quirks
It very much depends on the export armor in question. The export armor used during the Swedish Trials (the one Gaijin is basing DU Abrams’ protection on) were explicitly stated to be worse than the domestic package. A later package offered during the Greek and Turkish Trials were said to be roughly equal.
1 Like
The current DU turret is ~20mm more than the Swedish trials one [M1A1 AIM], and 20mm more than Steel Beasts as well because of that. [Steel Beasts uses Swedish trials armor for all Abrams in that simulator.]
???
Steel Beasts SEP/SEPv2:
Oh, they changed since the last time I looked.
I am basing my statement on the Australian Abrams as the ADF stated it had the same protection as the USA ones. The DU is replaced with a tungsten alloy that has the same KE resistance, for the first hit at least, as I previously stated the DU will withstand repeated hits better. I had not considered that there may be different variants depending I guess on how much the USA likes/ trusts the buyer and weapons export laws at the time of sale. That was an oversight on my part.
steel beast isnt even accurate
also 20 whole milimeters of armor?
it should be atleast 10% better
ten percent
650x10%=65, 650+65=715
and that should be the lowest they can go given that the swedish trial stated “substaintially better”
substaintially in tank armor would mean around 20-30%
Gaijin is… strict with requiring explicit statements, either percentile better than known armor values, or armor values.
Cause guesstimating is beyond them, in part due to fear of backlash.
Do I understand correctly that they will add a slamraam based on the Humvee?