Update 2.45.1.61

I would be, but I resist the urge in order not to come across as obnoxious hahah

I don’t mind keyboard typos at all; ut every time I see deep grammar mistakes, such as “should/must/could of”, an “it’s” where it should be “its” (and vice versa), etc, I have a hard time not bursting out in rage xD

So Naval Arcade is still broken?
Yet next Battle Pass offers ships?

4 Likes

IRCCM buff is nice, but it would be better if the PL-8B got its real IRCCM or what it is actually close to

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Vm2IhvAqFgYY

1 Like

i will pick and choose my moments for maximum effect (i expect I will become infamous)

Are manpads also affected?

1 Like

Man I wish they finally fixed F-4E cockpit to represent that of F-4F KWS. The cockpit is literally there, already functional, ready to be added. All it takes is a simple model swap

Thank you for ruining matchmaking again while doing nothing good about it !!!

3 Likes

Can we see the full list please

I dont think it’s for all missiles does the PL-8 use suspension tracking or narrow FOV for IRCCM?
Aim9M wont be adjusted by these changes as it uses suspension tracking and does not narrow the FOV of the occular.

Now we just have to wait for a fraction of the Aim-9Ms IRL performance. Just a few 2 year old reports for them yet to to be fixed but they would be a massive boost to what is rapidly becoming the weakest top tier missile

1 Like

Gaijin will add the 9X and Britain/Germany and Italy do not use it.

Would not be surprised at this point

I appreciate the changes to AB matchmaking. No longer are lineups like Sweden 13.3, 12.3 and 11.0 (literally the best lineup you can build for the Gripen A) artificially prevented from using the average BR just because “the other planes are too low in BR”, while nations like the US with a much stronger 13.7, 13.0, 13.0 lineup can play at 13.3.

HOWEVER

You broke the implementation. The system does not work for lineups like 4.7, 4.3, 4.0. Ingame, this gives you 4.7, however, according to the formula on the wiki (and knowing how the system is supposed to work), it should give you 4.3 instead. Please fix asap!

5 Likes

can explain what the meaning is? sorry, i am not really familiar for this FoV things. Is it only for irccm aam? or all AAM?

@Stona_WT
Sir, sorry to tag you
Aim7P currently is under a strange wiggling when it was launched or in DL mode
IDK why it just couldn’t turn smoothly like 7M
Is this a bug? Coz i believe no missile does that to waste its energy while tracking on target.
Please have a look at the video. Thank you

Further video support

  1. Highlight #War Thunder | Captured by #Outplayed
    Why would it spin like a UIIAI CAT instead of flying toward some direction at the last 10% stage of the missile?
    Why? This doesn’t make any sense

  2. Highlight #War Thunder | Captured by #Outplayed
    7P currently really has a serious tracking problem. Please fix it
    No way it denies tracking in this way
    Unless you said you guys decided to make it this bad…

When is the missing ESS going to be added for the M247? I figured it would at least happen with the introduction of the M246, or after two years of the report.

PL-5EII, PL-8B, Python 4 (not yet in-game), R-27T, R-27ET, R-73, Magic 2, Igla, Verba, Stinger, Mistral, TY-90, HN-6, Type 81C, Type 91, Strela

Where is aim9’s?

AIM-9M uses only suspension tracking and not gatewidth so it doesn’t get this change.

1 Like

Thanks

1 Like