accepted just means that they are taking a look at it doesn’t mean that its not an intentional feature
Not by developers, but by bug reporter.
Thanks! Your info was forwarded to the developers for review.
1 Like
There are many bug reports Stona, I don’t see anyone working on them, or at least reporting on if they will or not.
All Harriers time to speed significantly too slow // Gaijin.net // Issues
Harrier 1 Time to Climb // Gaijin.net // Issues
Harrier 1 Lacks Maneuvering flaps // Gaijin.net // Issues
Harrier 1 wrong airspeed limitations and gear operation speeds. // Gaijin.net // Issues
Gr,AV-8,Harriers all Flight Models Incorrect // Gaijin.net // Issues
There is almost nothing correct about the Harriers.
The DEV asked for an E-M diagram for the Harrier 1 here it is when is the buff hmm?
14 degrees a second sustained turn rate and 20 instantaneous is not possible in game. Its not even possible to get close to this in game.
The IR signature is too high making evading IR missiles almost impossible in some cases.
3 Likes
Also the sea harriers do not have their HUDs and playing them in sim is near impossible
1 Like
People write multi paragraphs with multiple valid sources and they get ignored or just marked as not a bug. Said they would fix the bugs last year but they havent.
Cant even access the bug report website, reported it ages ago.
1 Like
I’d love to still know why the Aubl 74 HVG is hated on by the devs. That’s 6.0 sec reload is too slow for a 60mm.
Considering the Turm III is vastly better in every regard > the Aubl for only a 0.3 br difference is silly.
Give the Aubl 74 HVG a 3.75 or 4.0 sec ace load time
Dont expect a change or reasonable reply, We been wanting to know why the UK is hated on for years. Should have a the IRL 4sec reload on average (3sec fastest). Asking for 4sec with ace crew or better and even have a 20 piece first stage ammo storage. Sources provided years ago, no change we are hardly balanced right now. No answers🤷♂️
1 Like
ummmm they did answer the ready rack IIRC
1 Like
We have, several times but they take often years to be fixed
1 Like
Log out of the wiki/store page and log back in. That clears it for me when it does that.
There are some reports that I think they will ignore indefinitely.
1 Like
yep either that or they dont have enough staff and a massive amount of stuff slips through the cracks ,though tbf alot of people post nonsense on the bug reports not realizing that some stuff is really obviously not a bug
2 Likes
I think in some cases they do have bias. They turned down credible and undeniable proof in the form of multiple sources that all have similar results. (For the Harriers)
The reasoning behind them not a bugging it was because they don’t believe it could do that.
The basic graphic model of the Harrier is not even correct to the IRL data and sources available. The fuselage shape and wing shaping is incorrect.
The Sea Harriers are missing some of there major technical improvements that made them Sea Harriers and not Gr3s.
Yet they will continue to add harriers and premium ones without even fixing them.
The Harriers are one of the most numerous aircraft in game and they haven’t even bothered to do the basics correctly.
IMO it’s just that the Devs do not like the Harrier and don’t want to work on it.
Not to mention the Harrier 2 having an AOA limiter of around 24 degrees. This is really dumb on the Harrier 2 as IRL its Buffet onset limit was close to 24 degrees and could hit 30+ full stick back without VIFF.
Would make it much more of a dangerous foe if you could actually pull the nose where you want to.