Hi, please remember to keep the discussion on-topic, and to not insult / put down other members. Please take personal matters / quarrels to PMs, thanks.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Rare T-80UK in Ukranian service
BMP-64 my also beloved.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Hopefully ukraine as russian subtree in 2025
Soviet* and maybe, it would be nice to have more of the post Soviet modifications.
No
Ukrainian subtree in russian tree would cause as many if not more arguments than Korean tree in Japan.
Ukraine would be much better in an eastern European tree.
Literally anything would be a better subtree for Russia but I’d suggest maybe Brazil or Iran
I agree, I don’t see any way to implement Ukraine in the same TT as Russia for the forseeable future.
A bi national TT with Poland and Ukraine as lead would be interesting.
Russia can get Iran and Belarus as subTTs.
This is “Ukraine Ground Forces Tree” topic, please do not create offtopic here.
Now we have Thai Air subtree, we can hope the Oplot-T is coming in 2025 for the Thai ground subtree to Japan.
Sub trees are for nations that have gaps in areas that can’t be filled by vehicles they already have. That is not an issue for the USSR tree.
It wouldn’t really be considered a sub tree
There is still not much of a reason to add vehicles made by an independent Ukraine into the Soviet tree. It has plenty of options already available to be added, and would be completely unnecessary for modern Ukrainian vehicles to be in the Soviet tree.
Doesn’t have to be a reason, it just makes sense and is logical.
There does have to be a reason. It has been stated the purpose of sub trees, and why a nation would receive one, but the Soviet tree doesn’t meet such a requirement of lacking in some areas that could even be solved by the addition of Ukrainian vehicles over ones they could already add.
It would solve the mobility issue