fair enough theres just alot of russian stuff or stuff from foriegn nations
Sweden (neutral since Napoleonic Wars) sending the worst possible APC to a active war in east Europe:
To be honest some countries are just sending old garbage.
5 Likes
i dont think a sub tree will ever work for this nation without completly obscuring USSR and germany again (see benelux sub tree, hungarian sub tree and sweeden very original tanks at top tier) and the only feasible option for these tanks becoming a thing is making them event exclusive (or premiums…) since most of the vehicles shown are very small or not very important enough modifications like T-72 or T-62 with kontakt-3 or relikt
1 Like
Relatively old for this conflict…For example, the most massive T-64BV thermal imager on the same matrix as the Sosna-U sight, a satellite data exchange system, a digital radio station…The most massive T-80BV (Russia) does not have all this…and so for each type of weapon, you can, if you wish, analyze the equipment yourself…
Tbf the late Pbv 302s they sent are a straight upgrade to the M113 in every single way and dare I say it one of the best cold war APCs. It’s major flaw is that APCs as a concept was made obsolete by the IFV.
1 Like
Oh Yes!!!
Just fit it into Russian tree, I really don’t see any reason to make this into another tree
its crazy how anyone could think it goes anywhere eles…
The tech-tree is called USSR. So all USSR equipment and former USSR nations belong in it.
Yeah, just because there’s a ongoing war between them doesn’t means Gaijin can’t merge vehicle into those tree, just look at China tree
there is nothing modern about their SU-27 and MIG-29. we dont need anouther copy paste nation, and on top of that we dont need the politics
1 Like
It’s not an APC, it was very explicitly designed as an IFV. Doctrinally speaking, it was used essentially the same as the Strf 9040 today. That’s why it has a 20 mm autocannon and hatches for mounted fighting. Converting the M113 into an IFV in a manner somewhat reminiscent of the YPR-765 was also considered but a purpose designed vehicle was found to be more suitable. Pbv 301 is also an IFV for that matter. Issue is the Swedish term pansarbandvagn doesn’t make a distinction between APCs or IFVs, hence the confusion
I would love other nations to be represented in the game, more nations more longevity and different options
2 Likes
that’s why i love ukrainian ground forces and polish forces
No thank you, just look at Israel tree those endless Patton and Merkava, adding more independent tree will just make those tree uninteresting like Israel tree, the best option is still adding as a subtree like Israel should added as US subtree
It’s alright to say you support the suggestion proposal but not Gaijin’s potential interpretation of it.
Israel has lots of unique vehicles that could be added in its current ranks instead of copy paste, the ability for ranks I-III with an assortment of unique vehicles to play with, and multiple options for a subtree that both provides interesting lineup filler and fits in quite well considering diplomatic and military relations.
So if you can agree that this Ukraine suggestion has a nice amount of indigenous vehicles of both quantity and quality, then at the very least you can support this fan made version of what Gaijin may add in a lesser state one day.
1 Like
Here is a link that describes Nizh-1M (ХСЧКВ-19) and Duplet-2M (ХСЧКВ-34) explosive reactive armor (ERA) in good detail.
https://btvt.info/3attackdefensemobility/bulat_dz.htm
I also like to point out the interchangeable capability of Nizh-1M and Kontact-1 brick casings even though Nizh-1M does also have its own casing. It can also fit into Kontact-5 casings as well.
If anyone wants to see a video of this, please message me directly
Nizh-1M
Duplet-2M
*Green Filler is K-1, Gray Filler is Nizh-1M for image reference.
6 Likes
Agree
