Literally BVVD has already said everything, so stop complaining on all forums.
5% more pen, 7% more weight. 3BM60 is better than BTA-4 in every aspect that matters.
Uh… Yeah?
Composite-less and coping.
1 Like
Like adding BMD4 before BMD3?
Here is hoping. 9070XT loves this game.
yeah its the USSR tech tree after all so its a tree for all member states of the USSR, if it was an russian tech tree exclusive it would be called RSFSR or just Russia and we wouldn’t have had things like the Su-25BM or the T-80UD in it
Yeah, he said that only country with Oplot in service is Thailand, guess what vehicles are also only in service in Thailand, but they’re somehow in other tech trees. He also said that Su-25 will be a good 10.0 plane, and when patch dropped it went to 10.3 a couple of hours later.
And who’s complaining? It certainly isn’t me under literally every post because I live in historical hysterical resentment.
Because it’s going into long-term storage, as no one is going to be using it.
I don’t think a 700-750€ card would need FSR to run such an old game.
tbh, I run it native, lol. But I want them to keep updating both DLSS and FSR implementation.
Definitely, but I don’t think newest xx70 series of cards should need that unless running high refresh rates on 4k.
1 Like
Yeah, and I purposely stick to 1440p anyway. It’s the sweet spot for gaming, imo.
1 Like
1440p is soon to be mainstream so running that is probably the best choice right now, unless you want to give an arm and a leg for a 4k worthy GPU.
1 Like
don’t worry man, remember when they said HARMs wouldn’t be effective and wouldn’t work basically? They’ll change their opinions, when they can sell a premium jet w/ HARMs, but only before they add top tier tanks with ECM :D
The T-80UD was in the USSR. The Oplot wasn’t. Simple.
• Bad Idea Grind-wise:
It’s just dumb on a logical basis of the fact the Soviet Tech Tree is bloated and overfilled with vehicles some of which that should be foldered. And even then the tech tree is too big on its own. Wouldn’t make sense grind wise to add Ukrainian vehicles into that. Sam for the US. Why would a sub tree of multiple thicknesses be jammed into it? There’s a reason Israel got their own thing.
• Timeline, and geologically makes no sense :
Not to mention. The T-80UD was used by the USSR. The Oplot simply wasn’t, and existed after the fact. It doesn’t make logical sense timeline wise either. None of that you said made sense to do. All it will do is make the grind more hellish, make no logical sense timeline wise, and would cause drama on top of those issues.
• Gameplay:
Not to mention that would make matches play out in a more stale manner. It would be interesting to have a match where it’s not all T series style MBTs fighting on the same team lmao. Me personally I’d love that kinda match up, as it would keep things interesting instead of Western MBT, Western MBT, One Chinese MBT maybe.
It’ll test your aim, it’ll test how many nations you branch out and play to learn weakspots.
We already have post-1991 modifications of soviet vehicles in Soviet tech tree.
Well considering the focus of the update (newer spaa) should’ve come last update with the others spaas, and the rest of the update is either copypaste or premium, that’s pretty easy to understand
That’s fine. Still doesn’t make logical sense. Revert back to the original post, reread. Come back.
Edit: You also didn’t specify which nation. I’m sure they aren’t in a conflict currently with said entity. Conveniently worded lol. If you’re gonna present an argument, do it in good faith is all I’ll say to that.
Yeah, one vehicle being of post-soviet nation(even two, somehow, one made the mod, and the other used it in service(Su-25BM)), other just being local mod(T-72M2 Moderna).
W h a t N a t i o n?
A r e T h e y i n C o n f l i c t W i t h
S a i d E n t i t y?
Simple.