I was under the impression that the Abrams was hydraulic for it’s turret traverse, until the SEP variants which changed to electric due to the hydraulic fluid being a fire risk?
Is that modelled in game?
I don’t think it’s outdated but that data is purely for visuals and it’s not the actual ammo exploding chance.
The amount of false information that dude spews out is honestly unbelievable.
1 Like
I have 400-500 games on various M1s, which is more than enough to get to know the vehicles. They simply aren’t that bad, as looking at all the doomposting on the forum one could think M1s are by far the worst tanks in the game.
1 Like
I pulled that from the forums. What faults do you see in what I said here? Are you going to deny that the turret baskets only affect US top tier tanks and Leos?
So you know that small caliber auto cannon fire can completely disable the Abrams frontally, you really cherry pick what you like to say
Well, you tried to portray that as if T-tanks have a less chance to get killed by ammo detonation, which simply isn’t true.
And I also know autocannon vehicles at top tier are a dying breed and the importance of turret ring is blown out of proportion.
There is no hydraulic pump in the turret that is a sump tank my guy.
Curious then that the T series tanks have a hydraulic governor that you can twist on the commander’s side right on the turret ring that increases or decreases the max rate the turret can traverse and how fast the autoloader functions.
I also raise the question of, “What is this?”.
1 Like
I found it wild how they even said in the YouTube blog about the Abrams that it was vulnerable to frontal autocannons, as if Gaijin is intentionally trying to put false information out there by making a game inaccuracy a historical fact.
1 Like
And I also know autocannon vehicles at top tier are a dying breed and the importance of turret ring is blown out of proportion.
Your opionion. My swedish IFV’s do good work against abrams, often disabling them frontally so they cannot fight back then moving to the side for the kill shot. It’s not even hard. A few rounds into the turret ring and his horizontal drive is almost always out.
The turret basket and ring of the abrams is vastly exaggerated in this game.
lol? For real?
You see how many hoops you have to jump through to get a kill, which wouldn’t be needed if you spawned one of your three MBTs which are among the best in the game. Thanks for proving my point about IFVs at top tier, didn’t ask but you delivered.
No mate, I was joking.
It’s a well known fact IFVs dominate the top tier with their strength and versatility…
Again cherry picking. You really have a narrow field of view. Okay, I’ll fix it for you
You’d be FN crying on the forums if a shot to a random shot to your MBT broke the turret ring every time. Don’t even say otherwise. Even bad shots to the Abrams ricochets right into the turret ring.
How about every Era shot on the T-series protects the tank but destroys the turret ring? Wouldn’t that be fun?
This simply isn’t true.
Shots above the driver’s port can ricochet into the turret ring, everything below that line is simply a non-damaging bounce.
Oh my, it’s not true! Pixel hunting can damage a tank. Thanks!
“Not a bug”
1 Like
Bug managers be like
1 Like
Wow. I’ve never seen someone miss the point by such a wide margin. It’s actually quite impressive. Well done, it’s a masterclass in trolling and then deflecting when called out on it.
The point was to point out the ridiculousness of your comment.
You are, of course, also ignoring that the abrams is at 10.7 which isn’t top tier and is absolutely infested with autocannon vehicles. But then, you knew that already.
hes baitin
i saw the scheme a while ago
1 Like
That looks inches too thin to stop anything remotely decent at that tier. The second turret ring gets improved the mald army will jump to the another non-issue to justify their skill issues.