关于中国主战坦克装填速度平衡的建议

I do not think so,Penetration does not equal destruction!!!
when u using the dtc-10 be like。Y aimed too high.too lower.too right too left


Less ammor ≠low survival rate
Let’s discuss the real situation:1.What should u do when u see an enemy’s tank turret hidding behind bushes 2.What should u do when u see an enemy’s tank hull hidding behind bushes 3.What should u do when u met an enemy’s tank suddenly without any bunker

Most of the players I have encountered will destroy enemy‘s barrel.However。。。(HP level 8 8 8)



steering mechanism

Leclerc (HP level 8 8 8)


steering mechanism

Ariete (hp level 0 0 0)

I think that thoese three tank mobility in same level,it is no difference to play with current map size

Last,i think dtc-10 and of120 have advantage in speed which depend on server to be improved.l believe that those tanks will be broken if server refresh rate higher.Shell:i shoot the weak spots。Server:i do not think so。

last of the last,china main battle tank have low survival rate after being shoot the weak spots。it should be change when other tanks have fast loading speeds or higher penetration

9 Likes

99a的装填时间资料可能难搞,但是装填时间明显是平衡手段,既然这样99a有6秒装填是合理的

7 Likes

99a装填在issue区被not a bug的原因我认为是错误的,不可能每一次装填都需要选弹,99a资料被管理员以蛮横无理的方式截留了,我们只能期待99a通过平衡坦克强度的手段来获得6秒装填了

8 Likes

就现在这个环境加上这个车体本身的性能数值,6.5s是最低限度的提升要求

6 Likes

我一直有个疑问,开发商和游戏设计组是通过什么途径判断中国的125mm坦克炮以及配套穿甲弹,性能不如俄罗斯(苏联)125mm坦克炮和穿甲弹的。是炮弹发射药?貌似中国的比俄罗斯要好吧!还是制造火炮的钢材质量不如俄罗斯呢?貌似在稀土等新技术的加持下,中国的钢材质量也比俄罗斯要强吧!所以,你们设计组是以什么为依据,让一款各项数据指标都强于俄制坦克炮的火炮发射的炮弹,性能反而不如后者呢?不觉得这种设定很可笑吗?

17 Likes

我们不如人家自信

3 Likes

快来水快来水

4 Likes

这就好比要他们承认“最好的侧卫不在Russia”。

5 Likes

就是俄罗斯导致侧卫名声变差的

5 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

3 Likes

MBT2000和两辆老99(99 II和 99 III)在11.0权重通过7.1秒装填来换取577mm的穿深的强度是合理的
但12.0那三兄弟(99A WZ1001 VT4)很长时间在顶级房用着7.1秒577多少有点幽默,火力 防护 机动 一项没占,这不是冷战或者二战那种通过高机动性领先别人一大截来先人一步到达优势点位,现代载具是高度同质化的,哪怕中顶真的用比别人快不了多少的速度优势到达好位置,进行“侧面自助餐时”,那也只会被7.1秒的装填速度给噎死,至于防护方面已经有人帮我补充了,我不做赘述(我个人一直觉得游戏中的中国载具油箱中装的一定是硝化甘油,这样才能解释如此逆天触发油箱爆炸的概率)

12 Likes

批判的武器不能代替武器的批判(开个玩笑)

4 Likes

风味系牢头三,机动火力防护没有一个是有优势的就很搞笑,哪怕是公羊这样的伪三代主战起码还有火力

4 Likes

我认为老99也得增强装填去11.3,老旧的11.0已经无法满足我了,我要玩z19和f5e

7 Likes

#1

3 Likes

还有伟大的红旗17!11.3的三位重量级。

5 Likes

I’ve played over a hundred matches with the 99A, and most of the time I get killed because the reload is too slow. I often can’t finish off an enemy in one shot, while they can one-shot me. The supposedly strong main armor doesn’t even cover the most critical part — the autoloader. Many times, the 99A feels like a slow-reloading and easy-to-explode version of the Abrams. You can aim straight at the lower hull to take it out. While the Abrams often just gets disabled, the 99A usually explodes outright.

Also, the Abrams could reach 5-second reload and a better gun depression, which the 99A doesn’t have. My 99III has a KD close to 2.8, but the 99A barely manages a 2.0.

8 Likes

developer should really consider the balance of Chinese tech tree. I played 2000+h and never saw any benifit of Chinese top tier army, which clearly the weakest country in your game, not only reload time, protection, guns view and so on. I CAN’T believe this is the so called balance and realistic game.

9 Likes

支持

4 Likes

Actually not really the weakest, but it’s the only nation that I just can’t find anything worth playing unless one is obsessed with the CN vehicles’ model. Nothing really unique

6 Likes