Just give airspawn to the B-66B and Vautours, necessary and sufficient solution
1 Like
@Stockholm_Blend
It’s not a false analogy, it’s an example. A false analogy requires one to change the standard of the comparison to another set of items, which I’ve never done.
F-104S is so far more advanced, that it’s obviously not the B-57’s counter.
The B-57’s counter is closer to the Sea Hawk in France and Germany, and Mig-15 for a guns-only platform.
I was specifying major threat against IL-28 as that was the context, no contradiction.
I never once brought up my skill in this regard. I brought up skill that is better than mine.
Me: “We need to decompression 9.3 and create BR 15.0.”
No where did I project that offer onto you or others.
No one is trying to silence you. Long ranting posts inventing fan fiction about fallacies, and falsely accusing others doesn’t have anything to do with War Thunder discussions.
No one false flagged you.
No one is projecting anything onto you.
All you have are false accusations that are personal attacks because you have no argument to stand on.
We need to decompress much more than just 9.3… we need to decompress almost everything
1 Like
The vaultourtho has air to air missiles tho and a better thrust to weight ratio than the b-66
The french Vautour IIA and IIB don’t have missiles
B66 needs its cci/rp and the rear radar reticle for turret. Also missing its 3 5k bombs and the 20 500lb cluster bombs. All things it had irl. It didnt use a bomb sight like it has now…
1 Like
Sir, that is what false analogy means. You use two things that differ significantly to draw a sweeping conclusion that supports your bias.
There was a big contradiction against treating R.511 and Vautour IIN when specifying them as a major threat against IL-28 or Canberra B(aka ‘Martin B-57’)
No matter using ‘your skill’ or ‘better skill in cleanroom level’, it won’t change that claim supported by rare cases with better skills can’t reflect real gameplay option.
I think I explained this part well in the last counterclaim, which got hidden.
B-66B: 5479.2kg + 19510 + 4116 = 29105.
Producing 9000kgf of thrust.
9000 / 29105 = 0.305 in-flight.
Thrust on takeoff: ~15500kgf + 9000 = 24500kgf.
24500 / 29105 = 0.84 TWR until ~560kph.
Vautour: 2488.2kg + 1700kg + 11500 = 15688.
6400kgf.
6400 / 15688 = 0.40 peak TWR from 0 to its top speed of around mach 0.90.
If you averaged out B-66’s TWR from its starting to its 1110kph cruise speed it’s around 0.572 from 0 - 1100kph.
So while B-66B’s engines produce less TWR than Vautour, the entire package produces more to its higher cruise speed.
And in air spawn maps it doesn’t matter because B-66 will get to its cruise speed faster due to no suspended bombs.