You said that Gaijin don’t want missiles with ARH seeker. Whenever you talk about them, you refered to them as “mmW guided ATGM”
Then you mentioned that Gajin declared they won’t add those missiles quoting the brimstones “case”:
So Gaijin was specifically talking about missiles with a ARH seeker, which would be FnF, more accurate than IR counterpats and ignore smoke. The emphasis on “ignoring smoke” is yours, not theirs.
So again: how can a radar guided Vikhr, which don’t have a ARH seeker, have the same power as a brimstone?
u are aware even if they are SARH guided it would still be mmw guided or cwm in this case right? the missle gets guided trough that system doesnt matter if its trough the missle itself or trough guidance of the plane
because u can fire multiple at once they automaticaly track and ignore smoke that your brain doesnt get that in your head
and first and foremost, you whole logic is nonsense and you are wrong until you bring prove vikhers has the ability to be guided trough radar in the first place and this isnt a bug
Atakas are the radar guided missile iirc.
if the vickers get “guided” trough the radar they are radar guided in this case as well
Well that’s the issue isn’t it? They are laser beam riding missiles.
Yeah SACLOS are generally radio or laser guided
RAdio
Detection
And
Ranging
not the same radar guidance like the mmw one
Interesting I’ll have to check that
if they would be the same they would be affected trough passive systems like MUSS as well
1 Like
Oh yeah my bad I forgot that radar on most SACLOS AA guides the sight not the missile.
in that regard i am gonna hit you with the same SACLOS (semi-automatic command to line of sight;
I was thinking LOS with the radar not a sight.
R73s on 29a ? They are historical, yet they can’t be added for “balance”. Warthunder doesnt have a rule on additions ti aircrafts , so why not?
