The M1A1 HC click-bait kinda have crappy armor

Yes, it’s very bad.

The neck weakspot is way, way too huge.

1 Like

Because it’s American, only Russian junk gets to overperform

2 Likes

I suck? You’re literally dog water lmao, Everyone knows Russian junk overperforms in game and the Abram’s armor is nerfed to hell.

And I main Russia.

American equipment would absolutely dumpster Russia irl

2 Likes

Yeah. But this is a game and game needs balancing. It’s obvious that tank that weights 1.5x more, costs 2x more has better armour than Russian cheapy and mass produced tank. Only issue is that balance at top tier is broken as hell. Yes you can find counterparts to CAS/SPAA in other minor factions but let’s be real, lobbies are filled with vehicles of the big three. New players are playing the big three. They are playing average at best. Now’s the question - why only one of big three has these exceptionally good win rates? ☉ ‿ ⚆

1 Like

That’s design engineers fault for making that hole that big which creates scenarios like pixel hunting that only happen in the game but not in real life. T-72/t-90s with dog 💩 reverse gear is in similar situation but it’s a lot worse because they get fk in game and also irl lol

1 Like

That’s Russia Thunder’s design engineers fault* for purposely artificially advantaging Russia, making every other existing vehicles crap.

I remind everyone 85% of the player base are currently queuing tiers 6/7/8, and that the current most played vehicles are russian. It is NOT a coincidence, it’s because it’s the META, simple as that.

1 Like

You make this up all by yourself? Fact: each gen of abrams is designed to defeat the current anti-tank rounds from the front. More modern abrams are designed to withstand 30mm from the sides.

This is logic, you boost your survivability by simply not getting shot at. Tanks aren’t supposed to constantly get shot at. Look at how easily they’re being destroyed and taken out once they’re engaged in a certain war in europe right now

2 Likes

You’re literally using video game logic over real world logic. They ARE built to survive, take hits, and keep fighting…especially frontally. They are also supposed to be used in combined arms to offset their weaknesses. Not going to argue with a keyboard general. Go get some real exp in the world and get back to me when you have the scars to prove it.

They are not built to sit there and tank hits like a tiger in a tiger fanboy’s wet dream
That’s what I meant.

Main priority is not getting hit or at least avoiding getting hit by a well-placed shot
Hence the ability to fire on the move, good mobility etc