Having to prove that something does not exist is not really a fair ask.
It is most definitely not. But from reading most of the prior posts in this thread it will boil down to this. The Kh38MT likely existed to some extent, there are 1 or 2 mock-ups but if the project was canceled, is still ongoing or lost funding early into the design phase is up to debate. My guess is that Gaijin wont bat an eye until proof is found, which probably hasn’t even been released to the public yet. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
“The Kh38MT likely existed to some extent”
Isn’t that essentially what people have failed to prove?
Yesn’t. I have never posted anything in the suggestion forum so I have no idea what gaijin takes as proof of existence. If a picture of a mockup is enough, the Kh38MT does exist. otherwise its a “eh” at best
The biggest “eh”
5 Likes
Technically, in order for weapon to be counted as acceptable to be added to a plane, working weapon should have been at least attached to a plane.
9 Likes
There are entire vehicles which only existed on paper and they are still in the game.
sadly for kh59mk2, we would have to wait for su57 to be added
I mean typically I’m not against some degree of leeway in the the way vehicles and weapons are implemented in the game, some nations need more help than others. But Russia is not one of them, and with a weapon like this having such a repressive effect on gameplay I think Gaijin’s standards ought to be higher.
1 Like
This whole situation is a double standard and i do hope it gets resolved one way or another. But yes some nations, especially small ones should get more leeway (to some extent they already are, the whole F16AJ situation)
2 Likes
And a lot of people, perhaps a majority, are not okay with this.
1 Like
Russia 100% needed something to keep up with others, they had no tgp or thermal sights.
If it had to be the kh38 is another question.
regardless, this here what we have with kh38mt is a double standard we don’t give other top tier aircraft such armament without evidence
Ah and it’s not double standard calling for it’s removal while other things are fine because whatever.
lmao bro what, Russia was hardly suffering with kh29ts and the fact you don’t an issue with the missile currently owning ground rb being fake is frankly bizarre.
you can make another post to call for removal of other unrealistic vehicles however if they are event/non tech tree then it isn’t equivalent. if it was equivalent then any vehicle carrying kh38mt should be non tech tree
they infact weren’t
and there is plenty criticism surrounding them. I mean the R2Y2s which have been in the game for years will be removed in a couple days. And they wont be the only ones
2 Likes
what are you even talking about here, what double standards state them, agm65s are garbage and you only get 2 agm130s. who else gets FAKE op missiles
1 Like