i believe yes
You all literally mis-read a section of what he said, on purpose to suit your argument nice. That’s called bias my guy.
So, Russian air force aircraft shouldn’t have it bc it’s purely for export then regardless of it’s very questionable existence
Would also love to see KORNET-EMD
isnt purely for export, its kinda those defence expos where they advertise their missiles, thats why E variants are here.
1 Like
they shouldnt have it even if it was real and for domestic use because it is in on way balanced
Yes, I agree.
Well where’s the plain MT then?
Yes and in that statement it says there is practically nothing on the use, yet thats supposedly bias
1 Like
Because nothing can be said of its current use in a certain conflict… because it’s against ToS
So i ask you how is it biased to say what has been said, because it really isnt
1 Like
So if all the sources that supposedly say it exists, cannot be used bc TOS, then to the game, it does not exist
1 Like
thats not what they said…
they explicitly stated that they did not show usage
1 Like
You and I agree on most things id say, but in terms of many many other weapons that truly don’t exist, 38cm, Tiger 105, maus, etc etc. this is far closer to existing than any of those.
Perhaps in a few years we can talk about those ToS forbidden things
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
they usually dont show the stuff they use, especially if its remotely related to su57
1 Like
They clearly do bc otherwise no one would know R-77M program exists. And all the clipped wing munitions for the Su-57
I only havent because I really am curious if there are sources out there
but at this point its safe to say he doesnt have any