This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
The sources were given, and most of them do talk about the conflict (hence why they could not be shared), however tbf they didn’t reveal much info, just some mentions of it without additional images
16 Likes
Not to mention their mobility.
They drive around like they’re in mario-kart in this game, yet in real life they judder all over the place.
Meanwhile you have the challenger 2 which dumps all its speed in a turn, in direct opposite to real life. There’s a wonderful video showing a ch2 doing a long turn in real life vs in game and its eye opening how bad the transmission modelling is in the game.
However, I feel like we’re very off-topic again. Not that there’s likely to be any more valid information as the weapon clearly doesn’t exist.
ok so they didnt actually prove anything
just him hyping them up
2 Likes
Did they explicitly mention it’s usage or just say it exists or just mention them by name?
No mentions of it’s usage, so yea. Some article(s) just mention it randomly when talking about all variants, but that is not about usage
2 Likes
so theres a good chance they just copied stuff from the brochures? with it being listed among the other variants that literally doesnt mean anything
3 Likes
if they had any semblence of credibility, they would copy from the brochure instead of making stuff up, hence no new info lol
yep, and he was really hyping those up too
its almost like he never wanted to post them or share them with mods
3 Likes
So the missile that basically made top tier ground RB a chore to play for the last 12 months appears to not even be in service ?
I haven’t been a fan of the russian bias theory as of recently, but this and the manpads article from a few years back really make me raise an eyebrow
7 Likes
not even not in service, from all evidence/lack there of it seems to have been dropped before or during preliminary testing
so may have never even existed in a functioning form
9 Likes
Kikka, Ho-229, etc aren’t Russian planes.
If Kh-38MT was alone either in its over-performing seeker or its status in-game as over-powered compared to SPAA.
And obviously the manpad issue is a non-starter cause Soviets have the worst manpad irrelevant of how others are made in-game. Manpads are still balanced on their current state after all, not their ideal state.
This is the answer I expected.
Yes, but there’s a margin as by how much a missile overperforms AA. The thing is twice to thrice as fast as the next in line : AASM, which is already quite broken
The problem i have with the way the manpads were handled isn’t the raw statistics they have in game (yes stinger and mistral are better than igla in game), but the source they chose, and the way they handled it. A bit off topic though. The performance margin between those 3 should be quite bigger than it is right now, and quite frankly, they shouldn’t even sit at the same BR
There is a full video where the reload is even less than 5 seconds. So why did you assume that it is 6 seconds?
There were 2 images in there of them…
id guess they were the same images of mock ups that have been posted here like 100 times
or images of other variants
There’s also a video of 4 seconds for turret-rear ammo for 5+ rounds.
There were 2 different ones… Jesus because I main Russia, everyone thinks RU mains are dumb, which makes so little sense…
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.