It is considered lucky if a bug report is “acknowledged”. Most of those bug reports just stay rot in Open status without any mod comments or tagging. It seems they are deliberately ignored.
1 Like
When you make bug reports, the only thing they’re going to tell you is that it’s not a bug when there are sources behind it
People who vote “YES” are totally out of the actual state of the game and the report issues lol
or alternatively they’re just players of countries with little to no issues to do with inaccuracy…
ahem Russian and Swedish mains
5 Likes
I find it hilarious when I open the Challenger tab to see the sheet volume of inaccuracies and bugs and suggestions on Challenger… and that’s just Challenger 2. God forbid if we included Chieftain and Challenger 1 suggestions/bugs.
This is such an unfathomable cope, I’m glad you wont respond because it’ll save me the trouble of reading such another stupid post.
“They are worse,” in certain areas, yes. However, let’s use LWS as an example: It is so infinitely useful that armor would become less important. Note that I’m pretty sure none of the Abrams or Leopard 2s have a LWS. Huh, interesting.
“You havent played the 11.7s!” Which is funny, because I never said I played all of them. I’ve played the Ariete (P), which believe or not, is an Ariete, and can and has been uptiered to 11.3. I should also note, you’ve only played 3/9 top-tier MBTs either so clearly you’re also “subjective,” especially when you haven’t even touched the 11.7 Abrams that’s being discussed, unless 3/9 is just conveniently “objective.”
Also, none of this changes the fact he hasn’t either. This is a prime example of an actual “Whataboutism,” fallacy. It doesn’t matter if I haven’t since I’m not the one running around saying “These vehicles suffer!”
Please try and gain some form of reading comprehension before you try and make up an “epic own,” that falls entirely flat on it’s face.
do you think gaijin leaves other nations aside ?
- yes
- no
0
voters
The big problem of the Gaijin devs is that they don’t listen to their community and by dint of it people will get fed up and will abandon the game and it will be funny for them to no longer have anyone frankly I laugh if a new tank game like War Thunder comes out and their devs listen to their community
1 Like
I have no hesitation to move then even now i rarely play this game
1 Like
I’m disgusted with blind devs, you get killed directly with other people’s tanks
1 Like
Wargaming didn’t listen anymore when the community invented Polish tanks. I came to War thunder thinking the devs were better… I regret that
We don’t agree the devs are blinding the kids instead of listening to their communities.
And then he’s amazed that people freak out at them
They don’t care about their community, all that’s important to them is money
When they’re at fault on some tanks, we’re going to tell you that you don’t have enough information
One day he would have to open their eyes
1 Like
hello when you are going to open people instead of playing blind frankly on war thunder there are only 3 nations the others are just decorations to make it pretty see when we are going to have mofid on the other nations china, italy, france , Great Britain etc. there are only 3 nations who are playing hard, the armor of certain vehicles needs to be reviewed the ammunition also as usual the devs are playing blind if they want I can buy them canes for the blind with a dog when a report is made on certain vehicles you are refused due to lack of information but the devs forget that certain vehicles are still in service so it is complicated to give information on the tanks in fact what is needed is information classified like that there will be the real information you should stop sleeping and listen to the community you must not forget that without the community the game would be dead I’m angry because playing with tanks that don’t have armor they’re STRAINERS against the others it’s complicated to have a tank you throw a ball of paper at it it explodes directly frankly see again some tanks from other nations is there we will all be equal in the game thank you for taking into account for once the information that many give to length of day do the maximum please
I’ve just been told that this site is not reliable, you have to be really stupid to get this out, it’s just the website of the French Ministry of the Armed Forces
Frankly, at Gaijin, you do it on purpose, be sure it’s very stupid
You could send me the link to the ticket where they said that please
Leclerc // Gaijin.net // Issues
there are sources ok I understand the answer but on the Ministry of the Armed Forces which is the official site
at worst, let’s leave them and when they see that Russia, Germany and the USA are the most playing nations, they will surely worry. I looked at it and WT has a very bad rating
That’s totally it too haha
Updated from the Leclerc Buff Post:
Fixed :
Gaijin.net // Issues turret rotation and elevtion speed - fixed
Gaijin.net // Issues apfds weight - fixed (No gameplay modification, only Statcard AFAIK)
Rejected :
Gaijin.net // Issues coax rounds - refused (game mechanic missing ?)
Gaijin.net // Issues armor (because of Swedish and UK trials)
Gaijin.net // Issues hull armour no. 2 (in addition to the previous one, Russian source not accepted)
Gaijin.net // Issues ufp angle (They don’t accept photographs, understandable, missing one other source)
Gaijin.net // Issues armor (Improved report disproving Swedish and UK trials as relevant sources) Rejected again, we are working on year another revision of the report
Gaijin.net // Issues - Well, 13 sources including video evidence are not enough. Great…
Gaijin.net // Issues azur naming (should be named AZUR 2006 as there exist another AZUR kit from 2011). Rejected for whatever reason, but very low priority report
In Limbo (acknowledged or not)
Gaijin.net // Issues smoke duration and diameter (its currently standardised in game so not much hope on this for now)
Gaijin.net // Issues smokes (give more smoke launches to the tank)
Gaijin.net // Issues he round missing (would be highly appreciate to overpressure Russian roofs)
Gaijin.net // Issues top speed (minor improvement of 1kph)
Gaijin.net // Issues azur lws (already physically modelled lol)
Gaijin.net // Issues side armor (against 30mm)
Gaijin.net // Issues carc / cce (French standard camo)
Gaijin.net // Issues missing hyperbar (should make the Leclerc as manoeuvrable as the ZTZ99)
Gaijin.net // Issues spall liners
Gaijin.net // Issues side armour (could resist 30mm auto cannons and RPG7 while keeping the crew intact)
Gaijin.net // Issues S21 wrong thermals (Comparing the specs to other ig gen 3 thermals, S21 sights should be gen 3)
Gaijin.net // Issues azur thermals (Same as SXXI but for gunner of the AZUR)
Gaijin.net // Issues incorrect model (Leclerc should be shorter than even the T80U, and yet is almost the length of the Leo 2)
Gaijin.net // Issues Incorrect top speed
3 Likes