when zepelinnnnnnnn
Never
noooooooooo
That would be nice actually. Especially if it moves away from 2 day stages and more to total points over the event period.
10 Likes
That’d be nice if they re-ran the bomber A-26 from years ago, the one with the bombardier nose.
1 Like
They could also start putting event vehicles into the warbond shop again
4 Likes
For me, I would love to have another shot at the Vilkas and Tog II
2 Likes
I could definitely see it for the low tier rewards during the summer/winter events like the J9 early and Late 298D.
Maybe the mid tier event vehicles could return but would require a new shop level?
1 Like
A pity counter system for SL crates would also help.
If you open X amount of crates without getting a vehicle that you don’t own yet, you are guaranteed to get one in the next one you open.
7 Likes
There will come a day wherein Gaijin learns that keeping their playerbase sweet with consistent shows of goodwill will keep player contentment high and increase their long-term revenue. For now, they throw us a few bones every now and then, but we have also lost a lot of value of the Warbond Shop and the Battlepass rewards at large. They have been doing well recently, and I have hopes that this upward trajectory will continue - more reruns like this would be most welcome.
Maybe next year’s Dreams Come True could contain a trophy for 8 Marks that contains previous years’ DCT vehicles? Snail pls?
10 Likes
It would make them a lot better although I’d still hope for a more consistent method.
1 Like
Doesn’t look like it sadly, seems like the planes are the rewards for the 7th and final stage.
:(
3 Likes
I hope you understand how incredibly shallow and dismissive this response comes across. As a community manager, your responsibility is to listen to community feedback, engage constructively with players, and address legitimate concerns—not become defensive or react as though criticism is a personal attack.
There is a clear disconnect between your approach and the concerns of your older, long-standing playerbase. When these players take the time to reach out in search of clarification or a reasonable solution, they deserve a substantive response, not an attempt to downplay or mock their concerns.
The solution is remarkably simple: allow players who have already completed the event to receive the remaining “Random Entente/German Empire vehicle from the list.” In practical terms, if a player already owns every other vehicle available, the only remaining rewards would be the two fighters they have yet to unlock.
This is not an unreasonable request, particularly when your existing lootbox system already guarantees at least one million Silver Lions when a player receives a vehicle they already own. Yet, instead of offering a comparable alternative, you are proposing a 20% reward for completing matches, in the context of what realistically amounts to approximately ten games per day.
This creates an obvious disparity between new and veteran players. New players only need to grind through the event once to obtain these vehicles, whereas those who have supported the game for years are effectively being asked to repeat the same grind for rewards they have already earned. That is difficult to justify and sends the wrong message to your most established playerbase.
You can argue that a year has passed since the original event, but that argument falls apart when you consider that players are not required to regrind the Maus every year to retain access to it. Why should this situation be treated differently?
Ultimately, regardless of how you choose to frame the issue, veteran players are being offered nothing genuinely new in return. Instead, they are receiving relatively underwhelming boosters that can realistically be obtained through normal gameplay.
I recognize that I cannot personally change this decision, but you are in a position to influence it. I would strongly encourage you to reconsider this issue. The proposed solution is straightforward, reasonable, and would go a long way toward addressing the concerns being raised.
Please do not mistake this feedback for hostility toward the game itself. Many of us continue to play because we genuinely enjoy it and want to see it succeed. However, dismissing legitimate concerns from your long-standing community is counterproductive. If these concerns continue to be ignored, another wave of community backlash and review bombing is entirely foreseeable.
There is still an opportunity to address this constructively. I strongly suggest taking it before an otherwise avoidable issue escalates further.
13 Likes
He is the dev teams messenger in this case.
His stance may be different from what the devs tell him to relay to us.
1 Like
Are they not lewis guns? Also really wish the tail gunners didnt have a huge zone behind the plane where they dont fire sadge.
1 Like
Yeah, they are Lewis guns in-game, and it has four, not five iirc
Thought so, also still wish I could find some kind of source for the tail gunners being able to fire anywhere behind, if they didnt have a huge weak spot it would be my fav low tier fun tier bomber.
Nobodies concerns are being “dismissed” here. Quite the opposite, we have been clarifying many questions and points today, forwarding feedback and addressing concerns.
It is also our job as Community Managers however to clarify the facts as they are so others are not misleading other players.
Once again, nobodies concerns are being dismissed. There is a difference however between constructive criticism and simply lashing out with negativity. There is no reason why criticism and negativity cannot be delivered in a constructive manor. Not simply calling things “lazy”, when thats just not the case.
Everyone can earn the aircraft rewards as the top reward for the event. Those that have the exiting vehicles receive additional bonuses.
This is an entirely false comparison. We haven’t removed access from these vehicles for anyone that has them. New top rewards have been added and the requirements to obtain those are the same for everyone, new or old. Being 7 stages.
No valid feedback is being dismissed. Threats or insults however wont be tolerated.
Again, constructive feedback is always welcome. Having something critical to say is however not a free pass to start hurling insults at the developers or any other members of staff however.
No concerns are being ignored. The very reason the event is returning is due to player requests to see it return. This is done on top of all of our existing events and plans. If something ends up being more of a negative then a positive however, we naturally have to consider if its a good thing to continue after all.
5 Likes
PLANES!!! . . . finally, I just hope that AB mode is available for this event,
because the flight models for these planes last time in RB was really bad
(horrible even) where a simple turn, even at decent speed would send your
plane to the ground. I’m sorry, but I do not believe anyone wants to try
to fly planes under those conditions.
The “forced adherence” to play RB mode all the time in such events needs
to stop, there are PLENTY of people that play AB and transitioning from one
mode to the other should not be so diificult for the players.
We need more continuity between the modes, not so much the mechanics
as those differences are part of the allure of having different modes.
But more rather how many things work between the different modes.
At any rate, I am very excited to get some WW I planes(particularly the
fighters) and get some real “old school” dogfighting in. (Much better than
having to buy a whole separate game[in a mode/version I do not really care for],
and something MANY have been asking for for a very long time)
Thank you for that
2 Likes