This plane has so muchhhh potential, but gaijin just keeps giving a blind eye , sigh
4 Likes
we did get an accepted report for rocket EEGS, so maybe they’ll go somewhere with that sometime, maybe if or when they add the F-86D
1 Like
Peak selective realism
7 Likes
This ain’t even selective realism at this point, with the AIM-4G/F and no AIM-4D it’s outright fiction lol
10 Likes
Remember to mention the F-102A in the survey and explain how you would like to see it improved.
8 Likes
And post the link to this thread!
Drop tanks, hull drag being too high [F-15 & Mig-35 mentioned], F-102 issues, heli PVE grind all mentioned in my feedback.
8 Likes
I hit the nail right on the head with this one
1 Like
10 days to forward for review, wow
would have been longer if I hadn’t asked a techmod to look at it specifically
2 Likes
Why can they just retexture the RB28 and copy paste it onto the F-102A, then make a radar guided version with the same flight model. Boom, AIM-4D and AIM-4A.
4 Likes
Right?, I seriously don’t understand what the devs are thinking at all times it’s seemingly such an easy fix yet they basically argue in bug reports and give stupid reasons for their decisions.
2 Likes
Another important feature is the logic behind the infrared seekers on guided missiles. Currently, they are guided to the geometric center of the aircraft, which can result in ineffective hits on large aircraft (likely hitting an empty fuselage section). We plan to change this logic so that the infrared seekers are guided to the hot engine area, which will make the missiles’ impact on the aircraft more localized and, for larger aircraft, more lethal.
Unfortunately, there are no mentions of fixes for radar-guided missiles like the AIM-4F and the upcoming AIM-4A.
Edit: He responded. They are looking into the radar-guided Falcon.
1 Like