But he doesn’t need to lift 2 tons)
3 Likes
Well I am not going to argue and we will see how she plays in the game. But I know for sure she will end up at higher BR and eventually end at 6.0.
I was mostly right about many BR changes and BR speculations because after 12 years players can tell what are the capabilities of other vehicles it faces and what are the capabilities of said vehicle.
Sadly devs do not see them and realise them after some time or years. It seems they do not play their game as much as they should.
Eg. when the french lor 40 was introduced at 6.7… you can find my posts saying she needs to go to 7.7 and see where she is after 4-5 years or how many years. I could anticipate the T58 heavy being at 8.0 with 90% certainty…
If you play the game for thousands of games and know the vehicles you just feel those things.
But it is just another go on creating “hype” that the vehicle is at low BR making people go for it and then slowly moving her to the actual BR, we have seen this xx times already.
So play the M55 at 4.0 while you can but keep in mind she will move up eventually to 6.0.
I cannot access these websites.
This is already the case, there are weapons listed on both official government websites and manufacturer websites but there is no evidence that they have ever been created, tested or used yet. It’s common for EU weapons manufacturers to know 100% that they are capable of creating something, marketing it but not building and testing it until they get sales (Here i made a real world example of this happening: The Kh-38MT may not actually exist - #724 by Necronomica ).
Why do you have to nerf the economy again? Did you not learn from what happened last time? Please Gaijin, learn from your mistakes and quit making things even harder than they allready are.
13 Likes
Censorship is like that)
Here is screen The Dev Server is Opening with Major Update “Tusk Force”! — 05.09.2025 - #323 by mawrtl
Ah, so the same that was already discussed and concluded to not be enough in the thread i linked. The Kh-38MT may not actually exist - #490 by ShOt_MaCkEr
I recommend actually reading through the thread to not make duplicate arguments or providing duplicate proof that has already been provided and deemed not enough by many.
Can we plase not make game worse again? Whats wrong with you gaijin, why are ypu always try to squeze some nerf to economy, when it have to be other way around with each patch
3 Likes
If you want a nerf so badly, report it to the gajin The Dev Server is Opening with Major Update “Tusk Force”! — 05.09.2025 - #331 by mawrtl
Since launching from a pylon is impossible, the missile is dropped, which means the speed of release is like that of bombs.
should be EldE 98 and OTOMATIC
1 Like
Shilkas are a lot more potent than the VEAKs were, but currently i can’t test the Strela-2M on airfield defence (Currently they are Strela-10M)
I’d say they should be sergeant York for the proxy (what made the VEAK such a strong Airfield AA in the past before it lost it) and then maybe one of the older AA systems, like CanADATS, ItO-90M, FlaRakRad
something you can’t just dodge at mid and close range by just pulling 5G
2 Likes
1 Like
What did they mean by this? the -2M is the SA-7B Grail, no.
I have not argued for or against anything here, I was just clarifying as there seemed to be some confusion at the start.
What others are saying is they want to remove the MT version completely from the game due to lack of proof of existence.
So does this mean your For the 38MT’s removal or against it?
im getting mixed messages here
Apache Fnf missile is better than PARS 3 LR in every single way, and you also get a gun.
Bring the Eurocopter down 0.3br or something
Can’t wait for the Falcon to go up to 8.7 because of those buffs
Also, one of those sources is called “Hispano Suiza Auto-Follow 30mm”, but the Falcon still has no tracking in-game
4 Likes
Ah yes, compression, my favourite balancing solution
4 Likes
This:
2 Likes
And, maybe even HE-VT too. Would even things out a little considering just how trash the AH-64s have been for a while now.
5 Likes
AMAZING!!! That was something I had on a list of mini-improvements that I would’ve liked to see. Still missing is getting rid of the fixed convergence of aircraft gunners, easily visible on the Bv 238.
Other great things to see, more cockpit updates and added cockpits to B-66 and the Fokker. Hopefully more show up, maybe due to Aces of Thunder coming at some point requiring a bunch of detail cockpits.
1 Like