They get moved to the Outer Wing station
Also
This thing have only Nord for ground munitions?
Interesting if it has the chute animation
My usual comparison post for model updates (Tiger II (P), Meteor cockpit update, and as it not seen before on aircraft, the components for the A-10 & Su-25) in comparison to the old versions, as I find them more interesting every update than most added new vehicles.
Tiger II (P) Update:
Meteor F.8 Cockpit Update:
Component Update - Using A-10A Late & Su-25BM for all A-10 & Su-25:
3 Likes
I don’t get why the AH64E doesn’t get the ATAS block 1 or 2. Compared to Verba and TY90s the AIM92A are just complete trash.
3 Likes
I wonder if the HMS on the Guardian is compatible with the AIM92A or if it needs a more advanced Stinger version
The report’s been in for …
Well I’m pretty sure it exists (may have been submitted though the old forums).
I’ve got sources for it potentially receiving the -92D &-92E, though it follows that Later missiles would be possible as drop in replacements since the ATAL mounts otherwise unmodified Stinger AURs.
I’ll go look for anything that points to the more modern variants being loaded before I write it up.
The ATAL is responsible for the command translation layer between the MIL-STD-1760 bus and the Stinger software (also Reprogrammable Stingers shouldn’t be an issue, as later software can simply be flashed to them in the field / armory prior to issuance, instead of needing to be Reconditioned at the depo level to load newer software)
Also I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s also eventually replaced by the NGSRI (Next-Generation Short-Range Interceptor) contenders such as Lockheed’s QuadStar as they are required to retain the form factor of the Stinger and be able to be loaded into the SVUL as well.
2 Likes
This change doesn’t make sense. It’s good in it’s current state right now, no need for it to make them harder to optain. This will also screw up the achievements, missions and daily tasks that will need to be rebalanced as well.
11 Likes
In RB/SB, this makes no sense, reason was OK before as the kills needed was halved (or kill rewards doubled).
Who gets 10 kills (combined ground/air) in RB consistently for 19 match (with maximum of 10 misses)? it’s rare sight anyway to get more than 1-3 for an avg WT player both in AB/RB.
Spoiler
I don’t even mention SB where cas dominates 90% of the time from 10.0 or so
(wink wink ground only AB/RB/SB mode)
In this case i would find out the avg kill of a WT players below maximum researched vehicle Rank 4 (roughly below BR 5.7) and adjust the kills needed by:
AB avg kill is 10 (with the +3), RB should be half (5) and sim half RB+1 (3) as RB/SB supposed to be harder game mode, but more rewards.
I results are:
- AB ground avg is 5 then ground Heavy Metal Mero will be 8, RB 4, SB 3
- AB naval avg is 4 then naval Terror of the Ocean will be 7, RB is 4
- AB air avg is 9 then air Hero of the Sky will be 12, RB 6, SB 4
This would dynamically change over time (every 3 months), giving opportunity for new players to receive these match rewards as opposed to seasoned players farming certain BRs with broken vehicles, which still happen but more chances for new players.
If this proposed changes will take affect for RB, myself and many other players can scrap their 10 kill wager on the spot.
5 Likes
@Stona_WT sorry for the ping.
In the latest versions of BR, the reload time of all KV-2 and T-30 was reduced to 24 seconds to improve the gaming experience.
But for some reason, this improvement in gaming experience bypassed the FV4005, which always reloaded much longer than the same T30, greatly inferior to it in both the quality of the shell and in survivability. Is it possible to reduce its reload to 24 seconds in a major update?
That would be fair.
Bring the vertical aiming speed of the BM Oplot tank to game standards.
Currently, this is the lowest indicator among all tanks with a battle rating of 12.0
2 Likes
Other tanks have to use similar rates at top tier just fine, the T-80U’s for example
1 Like
I disagree with you.
For a comfortable game this indicator should be high
They have what they have, you play around it
1 Like
For this mode you can demand realistic characteristics.
In all other modes this indicator should be high to make the game comfortable
Realistic mode is for realistic characteristics, just with more accessible gameplay than sim
2 Likes
I already answered you
You want the gamemode to change , then play arcade
2 Likes
Currently in the game tanks with a BR of 12.0 use an unrealistic vertical aiming value and I fully support this.
The Oplot should have the same vertical aiming parameters as other tanks 12.0
I highly doubt that all players will like it if tanks in realistic battles have realistic aiming speed.
I am sure that most players will not support this innovation.If it is ever offered of course
1 Like
Its using stabiliser speed