The Dev Server is Opening with Major Update “Spearhead”! — 24.10.2025

[Rinhord]

Can anyone even explain what this is supposed to do? I really dont get it what this acutally does xD

edit*
nvm, i found the button… holy is that unnecessary.

Hey mate, what u wanna play today? Kingdom of Italy? Syria? GDR? tf

[TheRecGandalf]

The MH-60L DAP still cannot fire its guns separately from one another. Please fix it so that the 7.62 mini guns, .50cal, and 30mm can be fired individually from each other. Community Bug Reporting System

[quartas121]

wheres the AH-1?

[Rinhord]

Do anyone have the Z10ME and can say if it will be able to take 16 Blue Arrows like the AH 64E?

[Circleati]

only 8 atm i believe

[Circleati]

this is an excellent feature, best addition this update

[りしれ供さ小]

Why AGS still no new ammo when it’s already 12.0

[YaSen]

Question about flags: I noticed that US flag can’t be changed to China or Israel, despite there are vehicles from said nations in US TT, on the other hand I can put Kingdom of Italy, Hungary or Romania instead of German flag, shouldn’t there be some consistency?

[Owner203]

@Ion_492

There is zero bias towards the Chinese player base.

Say that again?

[superpower_rus]

@Smin1080p_WT you really put su30mk2 in 13.3?Its presence makes the F-16 and MiG-29 at 13.3 quite awkward—perhaps even the JF-17 as well. It may not be as good as the Israeli F-16D, but as a premium vehicle, its numbers in battle certainly can’t be ignored.13.0 ,12.7 premium aircraft won’t be able to play.

[superpower_rus]

well ,I just checked it out on the test server, and the airframe performs better than i expected. in my view, It really shouldn’t be at this rating. In fact, because it’s slightly slower, it handles even better than the standard Flankers. What’s more, this aircraft can easily reach Mach 1.2 or 1.3 at an altitude of four to five thousand meters.
#Datamine reveals that aside from being heavier, the Su-30MK2’s airframe remains completely unchanged compared to other Su-27 variants.

[Rennie1018129-live]

I really wish youd stop with the attempts to automate naval, its gonna completely destroy whats left of the mode if the current damage control changes are implemented

[_Renzo]

It has the same garbage radar as the J-11A, which is worse than the Su-27SM radar.

And now that they finally moved the J-11A to 13.3 (only took them a couple of years and a russian premium to do it), I don’t think that the Su-30MK2 is going to be too crazy.

[Rhosta]

KV-1S to 3rd rank when?

[Godvana]

We are exploring the possibility of implementing various anti-radiation liners and their various analogues of similar liners, as weaker alternatives to the Spall Liners in order to introduce them to tanks that have them.

It’s extremely depressing that after years you guys STILL have not implemented the missing spall liners on many German vehicles, yet are now moving on to add… radiation shield?

Examples:
Leopard 2PL
Leopard 2A4M
Leopard 2 PSO
Leopard C2A1 MEXAS
Puma
Vilkas
Boxer MGS

Last time I brought this up, which was probably a year ago at this point, the response that it takes time for 3d modeller to be assigned to a report, which is fair… but now time has passed and there are still no spall liners, but apparently there is the time for the modelling of radiation shielding?

Instead of radiation shielding, can maybe the ACTUAL spall liners people have researched and have waited years for finally be implemented?

EDIT:
and the Pzh 2000, how could I forget

I should also mention, this isn’t limited to German vehicles, but it’s what I’m most familiar with. I’m sure people can their own examples too.

[uMnepu9I_Zla-psn]

Same aplyes to all Leclercs and not only them, but spall liners will get only russian, us, sweden and… thats all?
Maybe we can mention leo 2a7, or sone other new stuff but not the old ones

[Noel_Combat]

Hey @Smin1080p_WT any new info on the infantry mode? It was announced 6 months ago but no update

[Kweedko]

@Stona_WT

Damage control has been reworked for all ships.

That my thoughts on that change

@Kweedko

With current approach weak ships will be affected way stronger than strong ships, that will create even more disbalance to the naval fights - DDs melting like a torpedo boats from just a random salvo or two in the same spot of the ship. When DD should be a little bit survivable then we have them now, not less what comes with this mechanic with current implementation.

I propose to keep selection of priorities and modifications and use them in battles, but also keep manual enabling of separate “Damage Control” mechanics. With that we get - fastest fire extinguishing or folding repairs or gun repairs priorities, but in the same time we still have option to not enable some of them if situation requests - for example i need to repair mu guns or motors, but i don’t care that there is a fire in the tubes or in compartments. That will be way better that forced “Damage Control” that you can’t switch off, what will lead to faster death from crew loss.

Cooldown on preset switch is also a problem that will lead to all experienced players will switch it to fire fist preset and never change back to not risk it being on cooldown when ammo or barbet is on fire. With this approach unexperienced players will die even faster, which will disappoint them more, cause default setting is repairs first and and switches to that preset every time you respawn - which also add more managing routine, compare to previous system where you could auto damage control for different type if needed and it’s remembers on spawn which was last used. I prefer no cooldown on switch and cycling it on a single button with memory of last selected on respawn.

So in the end we get single button to cycle presets and old 3 buttons for manual enabling needed damage control mechanic(with auto options) as it was before. With this approach new mechanic will be enjoyable and useful.

Problem of some too survivable ships should be addressed with different approach - hull damage from ammo stowage explosions, hydraulic shock from bombs and shells, exploding near hull in water, underwater penetrations or decreasing the thickness of crew compartments which in current implementation just eats up all shrapnel from shells when stacked it thickness with decks thickness.

[Noel_Combat]

how can i test drive the flying pancake

[Loofah]

Wow, still no fix to plywood not fusing HE shells. How surprised I am!