thanks for the answer
Chieftain and Chally 1 buffs incoming then (the reports will be stuck in purgatory like the ready rack buffs)
6 Likes
To bad the chally’s wont experience launch Spall liners lol
With the introduction of Sea Eagle coming to the Hawk, where is Exocet/Harpoon/RBS 15? The argument we were told to oppose the addition of exocet was the lacking land attack functionality, yet Sea Eagle has none and Japan’s ASMs lack the functionality. This means the argument opposing exocet does not hold true. I, and others, believe it is time to introduce exocet and equivalents in order to fairly distribute the weapon type.
2 Likes
Let’s say MB-326k from researchable tree it’s late production
I hope gajin change engine to Viper Mk.632 instead Mk.540 🙏
1 Like
Just asking should dev server be up to date with the real server or is it completely the same as u left it the previous time?
You didn’t fix convoy bots they still aiming and shooting 20 mm at 8 km
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8ee2k99YfxvG
2 Likes
I know, have it moved up
… not the Tornado ASSTA.1?
1 Like
No way Japan was denied the VT-4 then they turned around and gave China the Oplot too 💀
6 Likes
At least it’s a better grind than the su-27sm, Altho that at least gets r73s stock
Exocet / Harpoon are not planned for this update. Its possible other ASMs may appear in the future. However these are of lower priority as they are more gameplay gimmicks than functional or practical currently.
4 Likes
Ahh hell nah 12.3-13.0 is toast
And became what? AGMs? A few less datalinks? Gaijin really thinks this is equivalent to the MiG-29SMT and 0.3 above the likes of the F-14B?
Or might be MB-326K (e) for premium golden eagle ?
It’s only this br because it has spo15, which imo isn’t enough for it to be below su-27sm, but hey gaijin balancing
Okay then why is it getting added with the Hawk? Seems to me like that’s a low priority, and really shouldn’t have been bothered to implement until it wasn’t a gimmick.
It won’t stop being a gimmick until you people add them to the platforms capable of carrying them, thereby making it half worth creating an objective for ASM capable attackers. Or are ASMs only allowed to the chosen few? They were added to the F2 to deal with carriers, but now they’re a gimmick the moment any of us ask for them to be fairly distributed? After you broke the outline for why we aren’t getting them by adding a dedicated ASM instead of a missile you could fudge as also having land attack capability?
It is incredibly peeving this double standard that seems to shift every time a new weapon is added that breaks the outline we were given prior. ASMs aren’t the first weapon type to see this behaviour from your organisation.
2 Likes
Precisely because people left feedback, such as yourself, requesting more of them to be added after the ASM 1/2. So as mentioned, its possible over time, more will slowly come.
The Hawk was an opportunity to introduce a new one into the game at this moment alongside it. As already mentioned, others are possible in the future too. However they are a much lower priority than more functional weaponry.
Great, why is it not coming with exocet if that is the position your organisation takes? This would have been the update to do it across the board. Exocet would have been the missile to do it with, as it is fielded on a number of platforms instead of just adding a new ASM to 1 new aircraft. Or Harpoon. Exocet is my preference, but if you’re adding only one ASM, at least distribute it accurately.
Alternatively, why are we only going to be finding Sea Eagle on the hawk instead of distributed to compatible platforms? This is generally a less packed update, it could have easily been done this update and you’d have avoided yet again creating another instance of the chosen few.
As it stands, it feels like you lot are taking the mickey.
1 Like