PL-12 nerf tomorrow
4 Likes
Any word on changes to the model of RBS-15F btw?
PL-12 removed tomorrow trust, J10, J15 and J16 use Aspide now instead
2 Likes
Our best ATGM is substantially better at terminal performance than anything the US has, and we have everything the US has anyway on top of that - any buff to the Brimstone would be a substantial buff to CAS in an environment where CAS is already intolerably powerful in most games. Harriers missing Sea Eagles is also one of the least important things wrong with the GB TT.
And what premium would we even get? Another Indian aircraft? A fantasy version of the EAP? A copy-paste Tornado? Why do we even need something with ARH missiles anyway? The MiG-21 Bison already pulls huge amounts of weight at it’s BR, the CF-188A is the highest BR premium that Germany get too and they do just fine.
The GB TT has huge problems but plucking nonissues and portraying them as glaring problems just weakens the arguments of everyone who actually wants the major issues such as the CR2’s armor fixed.
1 Like
Since you are showing the MG FF/M some love, as well as gave the 15mm MG 151 a new AP-I belt, maybe the MG FF/M can also get a proper armored targets belt?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/BpTmK3AwlsAT
at least it’s gonna be a buff, since the Aspide is getting rework
1 Like
I noticed the devserver went from 2.58.0.28 to 2.58.0.31, but I have no idea what changed.
@Smin1080p_WT Rafael cant use exocet rn because of no ground radar mode :( , also add to super entendard pretty please with a cherry on top
2 Likes
He said they’d be added
1 Like
Okie dookie
when nuclear thunder becomes a permanent mode
will it count towards events in the future or for challenges?
would be nice to have the bison get its missing loadout of 4 r77, but that won’t happen
Hi @Smin1080p_WT, i hope i’m not bothering you tonight too much.
Could you take a look at this report of mine, i feel that this a big issue for jets (especially the modern F-16’s)?: Countermeasures becoming flare only
@Smin1080p_WT Given how Greek A-7H lost most of its loadout, can we expect lower BR as well? Right now its worse in A2G derpartment then a su-25, and don’t even have all-aspect A2A missiles, while being 0.3 BR higher for some reasons.
UPD: Also there are even supersonic capable attackers such as Su-22M3 and Tornado IDS WTD61 with all-aspect A2A missiles and 9.7 BR.
5 Likes
I can’t look at it on the server right now, does it have any guided A2G weapons at all?
Not anymore. It lost its FLIR pod, walleyes and shrikes. It would be actually great to have pure bomb/rockets/guns attacker, but it also should recieve appropriate BR. Right now we have much better options sitting 0.3 BR lower and also having all-aspect missiles.
Also A-7E should recieve Aim-9L/I because Greek version was using them and we have Su-25BM at the same BR with R-73.
2 Likes
If it doesn’t have any guided weapons, I don’t see why it shouldn’t sit at 9.7 in GRB
About the A-7E, I don’t know if you would want that thing to sit at 11.3 lol
The A-7K is terrible at 10.7, so I don’t see how having AIM-9Ms would make the Corsair any better at an even higher BR
2 Likes
Viggen’s AG radar can spot air targets irl if they are big and/or close enough but you are right, it doesn’t have an IFF interrogator and locking function (only radar ranging for gunpods and A2A missiles)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nHVBhbcSQiyC
Any updates on this AMRAAM-ER report? I haven’t seen anything in the dev server.
Well, we have tornado at 9.7 without any guided weapons. Regular su-25 as well because you cant really count kh-25ml without any sort of tv weaponary to complement it a proper guided weapon. And RN A-7H is not even 9.7, its 10.0 for some reasons. I hope its just not properly tuned so far.
Its shouldnt go at 11.3 because we literally have su-25bm which is much better sitting at 10.7 with r-73. This is why I think A-7E with aaim-9L/I would be fair at 10.7.