i don’t have that option
then just use vsync
it only work with DX 11 but not with DX 12 i made bug report long time ago maybe it get fixed
then just use dx11
What gpu do u have
oh before i forget, can u nudge the report for the Tigers to get 144 countermeasures?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/53OaOQ3umQSF
@Smin1080p_WT Any chance you could give these reports for the Block 52 a bump please?
[DEV] F-16C Block 52 missing NCTR data In MFD Page
[Dev] F-16C Block 52 missing CDU MFD pages
The NCTR in the MFD page has been missing on all F-16’s with that page and currently missing from the new Block 52.
And the Centre Display Unit in the Block 52 cockpit is currently missing the TGP and HSD pages on the top and the weapons store page on the bottom section where the map currently is.
I noticed the Blue fox radar in the sea harrier was changed.
Is there any news of the devs changing it correctly? Still very different from the report filed.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2JHbw1v5oV0r
they wont
just like they werent for the Leo2 and abrams
what is it? seems i missed it
edit: ahh the german boat
Would it be possible to have someone else look at this please. It has been closed minutes after opening it so I find it hard to believe any sources or attached material were looked at. Same with the explanation in the report.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/EFvPyztpDW0d
Bro, trust me. I had to shelve the Buk because it’s really that bad. It needs a specific firing angle to launch its missiles, and even then, the missiles have a very low probability of hitting the target. It’s honestly worse than the Pantsir.
Do you mean that until now the change was only visual?
So what, Gaijin believes TRIGAT LR is not the same thing as PARS 3 now ? We learn something new everyday, afterall only compatibility is needed, which is the case, not having it into inventory is not important.
From what we can see, its one of the best performing SPAAs in the game. Certainly better than the US option.
That was not mentioned anywhere. Simply these additonal PARS pods were developed for the UHT after the HAC was already rejected and no longer being trailed. They were exclusive to the UHT.
There is no evidence the HAC is compatible, since these were additonal pylons added on after that require additonal wiring and modification. The HAC was already rejected from French use by this time.
The engine was not fully configured, but now both the visual model and FM have been tuned.






