We think update dropping Wednesday?
I stay with 17th/18th
I’m looking forward to it
These are precisely the moments when I struggle to understand how the developers work. To me, it seems very unstructured. I mean, if you’re already working on revising a model from the series for a different research tree, why not finish it? It doesn’t make much sense. I’m certainly no developer, so I don’t know how much work it all entails. However, since the models are similar in many ways, the effort shouldn’t be immense, right?

Yeah definitely simple /s
Is there any plan to change the type of explosive for China’s top bombs? They are all pure TNT, like LS6. This is really not in line
Only the Chinese tech tree is still using bombs made of pure TNT
This wasn’t meant to imply it would be easy or require little effort. But compared to an entire series, it’s simpler than fundamentally different models. The A series of the Fw 190 only has very minor changes; the F8 has a different canopy. In the D series, the D12 and D13 are almost identical except for a different propeller, while the D9 differs slightly in its engine configuration due to the two MG 131 machine guns. Admittedly, the Ta 152 requires a bit more work, I believe. But all in all, as I originally intended, this would allow for the overhaul of a larger number of 3D models with relatively less effort.
Hopefully they do something with the AGM84H in live, because currently they are basically just big Mavericks with shoddy terrain-following
Greetings,
Any news on the following reports being acted upon for the upcoming update?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/OcMYQ2z1zDlN
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/q4numP2dL20K
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ULvSC60SVBFw
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2Zw2TEF0J45a
Yes.
Also why wouldn’t it if the Israeli f15 can?
No? I mean 2x the explosive mass. They don’t loose speed + they go top down.
Does AGM-84H have GPS in dev server?
Any news about the F15E, F18E, (F16C PoBit too probably) to receive the GBU53 IR+IOG+GNSS glide bombs, the equivalent of the SPICE250?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/tS1rgdX6GLTM
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ztnXJiKITuV6
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PEWFL2yhJEzK
What about the radar for the CLAWS and NASAMS 3? I know the RPM was fixed, going from 15RPM to 30RPM as stated but having their TWS ESA added and receiving it’s backtrack back after the range being bumped to 75km for both. The NASAMS 3 should also get an increase to 120km of range for only one side, and probably for the backtrack too, as the normal CLAWS radar has 150km total search range.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/fT2macwh4Qzk
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ibd3oYpoqd0o
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pqagHi62MWWV
+1
No answers for an year or even years…
I wish they add those because American cas suffers in toptier
Yes and iog
Ohk, thanks for the info
Should we expect exocet soon because terrain following missiles are here now?
Here is a stat card for it:

Thanks!