The Dev Server is Opening with Major Update “Ninth Wave”! — 16.03.2026 (Dev Server is CLOSED)

As a follow-up to show just how mindboggling using the figure for KDA and KDE is;

This is the Vector GA35
{2B9D3C34-A4E1-4FB4-9827-7EF1B1345651}

This is the Oerlikon 35 mm automatic cannon type KDA

This is the Oerlikon 35 mm automatic cannon type KDE
{BF38C623-5D76-4128-80C1-C478A08C4F5C}


How does anyone even believe that the source for GA35 is even remotely viable as a source for the two oerlikon cannons, when it is literally a completely different gun?!

At the same time, what @Smin1080p_WT said previously doesnt paint the whole picture
{E73025C0-E0C3-4EF4-86A3-4AFC304E0757}

The brochure quite literally states the maximum deviation values right below the typical (1 Sigma) ones.
or does “max” mean “maybe, nah actually 0.6mrad max means 1.66mrad max”

Even if you argue that the values above it are more “reliable” this still does not, in any way shape or from, justify nerfing ENTIRELY DIFFERENT CANNONS on the sole bases of “can fire same ammo” (it cant fire all rounds that KDA and KDE can btw but who cares if we are now nerfing gun dispersion based on a completely different gun, eh?)

After double-checking, it turns out it fires ammunition that vastly differs from the oerlikon ammo:
{5429CBBB-8A3C-477A-AA80-14644507269C}
Differing values are;

  • Much higher max and average gas pressure (KDA/KDE: 385MPa max)
  • Different Muzzle-Safety (KDA/KDE HEI, HEI-T, APHEI-T: 20m)
  • Different Tracer Duration (KDA/KDE: >4s)
  • Different SD time (KDA/KDE: 5.5s)
ref.:

{7B3B0755-47E8-41C5-B83C-523011791ECC}

{30471492-E6CC-47AE-AE7C-205C38BFF66E}

{7705A087-DE05-4DDB-AD67-B65D9D982B50}


Edit 2:
I just realised that they flat out lied about the dispersion it had previously:

Before the changes, the maximumDeltaAngle was 0.08°, which corresponds to circa (<) ~1.4mrad, i.e. 1.4m at 1000m and NOT 1.3m as they claimed.

They then ALSO lied by claiming they increased it by 15% to 1.5mrad, i.e. 1.5m at 1000m as they changed the maximumDeltaAngle to 0.095°, which corresponds to 1.66mrad, i.e. 1.66m at 1000m.
1.3m * 1.15 = 1.495m
even using maxDeltaAngle its still a lie:
0.08° * 1.15 = 0.092°

{E9A84DFF-A27D-4FE6-98E8-5AACE8BEB893}

Datamines, DEV-version: 2.54.0.20

Reference: Smins response

The Dev Server is Opening with Major Update “Ninth Wave”! — 16.03.2026 (Dev Server is OPEN) - #1570

So ig the new summary is:
→ Takes source for GA35 that lists typical and maximum values
→ Ignores maximum values and calculates them based on typical ones instead (arguably justfiable)
→ Nerfs two ENTIRELY UNRELATED AND COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CANNONS (KDA/KDE)
→ Lies about previous ingame dispersion value
→ Lies about new ingame dispersion value (or accidently messes it up, idk)

This is so incredibly absurd and dishonest in every single way you can imagine it.

27 Likes

Oh, hey, hey!

I am VERY glad to see you are finally venturing into implementing the new physics to the side skirts and mudguards of tanks!

These may only be a visual improvement; but it really makes tanks feel A LOT more dynamic and realistic. Excellent job!

These are one of the main highlights of this update for me.

I just hope you give the Merkavas their famous chains… that would be the cherry on top! :D

Also hope to see these physics added to Type 10s’ skirts, ZTZs, T-72/90s, and more over time. Good job!

3 Likes

Challenger 2 (2F)/TES/OES — grill armor on the rear of the tank. ive been waiting for this day

1 Like

It has 0 IOG drift = updated autopilot (I guess, idk)

Any plans on updateing the Pz IV Ausf.E and or StuG III Ausf.A model, they are also rather incorrect and heavily outdated.

AGM-84Hs…nice.

So we can have SPICE 250 for Isreali F-15I and JAS39s but no GBU-53/B (worse warhead than SPICE 250) for US F-15E?

1 Like

“These two guns are similar so they must have the same performance.”
Meanwhile when I reported the fact that AH-1S and AH-1S Kisarazu have differences they told me to provide documents even though Kisarazu is the same aircraft just with a skin. Hilarious double standards.

5 Likes


Is it supposed to be so?

3 Likes

Is that the new Pantsir? (lol, lmao even already if it is)

1 Like

no, but last time i checked it’s the same for the new one

Can you show the statcard of AGM-84H? Does it have a GNSS and what is the size of the warhead?

1 Like

image

5 Likes

That’s wonderful! I’m so happy, thanks!

3 Likes

I need to test myself later today, but some folks say it also dives to ~600m for cruise and then does a terminal pop-up. This may make it significantly more difficult to intercept and would be a delightful capability expansion for US CAS.

I am asking for the purpose of SIM EC, so I am very interested in how the point lock will work. Is direct line of sight required for launches over 30 km, and how will GNSS help with this?

You need LOS, gnss just removes IOG drift(at least on A2A missiles idk what it does for A2G but should be the same)

Where?

1 Like

@Smin1080p_WT

Any chance you could give a nudge to these reports since the dev server is open once again? They may have been buried by other more recent reports. Thank you.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/LyprLFSkpUNo
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/f4P9p6hOpICC

2 Likes

so basically britain gets nothing british for aviation this update just another aussie plane, disappointed to not see a new hurricane mk2c or even a folland gnat.

2 Likes